SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 474

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, DEEPAK ROSHAN, JJ.
Bhikhan Ganjhu @ Deepak Kumar, S/o. Bandhu Ganjhu - Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through National Investigating Agency, represented by Superintendent of Police, N.I.A. - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 554 of 2024
Decided On : 14-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Advocate
For the N.I.A. : Mr. A.K. Das, Spl. P.P.

The court ruled that generalized allegations without specific evidence do not constitute a prima facie case for denying bail under the UAP Act.

Headnote:(A) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Section 43D(5) - Bail application - The court examined the prima facie case against the appellant, who was alleged to be a member of a terrorist gang, and found the allegations vague and generalized, lacking specific evidence of involvement in terrorist activities. The court ruled that the absence of a prima facie case warranted the granting of bail. (Paras 12, 13, 14)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 439 - The court reiterated that the inquiry for bail under the UAP Act must not conduct a mini trial and should be based solely on the materials presented in the supplementary charge-sheet. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was accused of being a Zonal Commander of TPC, involved in extorting levy from coal traders. The allegations were based on a supplementary charge-sheet that lacked specific evidence against him.

Findings of Court:
The court found no prima facie case against the appellant to deny bail under Section 43D(5) of the UAP Act.

Issues: The main issue was whether the allegations against the appellant constituted a prima facie case for denying bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that generalized allegations without specific evidence do not meet the threshold for denying bail under the UAP Act.

Result: The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was granted bail.

JUDGMENT :

(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)

Heard Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. A.K. Das, learned Spl. P.P. for the National Investigating Agency.

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.03.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No. 3601 of 2023, corresponding to RC 06/2018/NIA/DLI), arising out of Special (NIA) Case No. 03/2018, by the learned AJC-XVI-cum-Special Judge, NIA, Ranchi, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.

3. A written report was submitted by Ramdhari Singh, Sub Inspector of Police, posted at Simaria P.S. to the effect that on 10.01.2016, a secret information was received by the Superintendent of Police that in Amrapali Magadh Coal area in Tandwa some local people have formed an association which is related to the banned extremist outfit TPC. The members of such association were extracting levy from coal traders and DO holders by creating fear in the name of the extremists of TPC, namely Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohram Ji, Akraman Ji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischay Ganjhu, Bhikan Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan and Bindu Ghanju. It was also alleged that if any businessmen hesitates to pay levy, they are threatened by members of such organization and are also subjected to hardships. In order to verify the truthfulness or otherwise of such information a raiding party was constituted on the orders of Superintendent of Police, Chatra. A raid was conducted in the house of the President of the association Binod Kumar Ganjhu and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 91,75,890/- was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be submitted by Binod Kumar Ganjhu with respect to the recovery of such a huge amount of cash. From the house of Binod Kumar Ganjhu two persons were also apprehended who disclosed their names as Birbal Ganjhu and Munesh Ganjhu and on search of their persons a loaded Mauser pistol was recovered from the possession of Birbal Ganjhu while from the possession of Munesh Ganjhu a country made pistol and two live cartridges were recovered. Both had confessed of being associated with TPC organization. Binod Ganjhu had disclosed that he is the President of “Magadh Sanchalan Samittee” and the levy collected is sent to Gopal Singh Bhogta @ Brijesh Ganjhu and thereafter it is distributed between Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischyaji, Bhikan Ganjhu and Deepu Singh @ Bhikan. He had further disclosed that Bindu Ganjhu is a member of “Amrapali Sanchalan Samittee” who collects levy on behalf of TPC and since he is at present in jail the collection of levy is being done by Pradeep Ram. On such information a raid was conducted in the house of Pradeep Ram and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 57,57,710/- in cash was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be given by Pradeep Ram with respect to the cash recovered.

4. Based on the aforesaid allegations Tandwa P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 was instituted for the offences under Sections 414, 384, 386, 387, 120B of the I.P.C., Section 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 (1)(2) of Criminal Law Amendment Act against Binod Kumar Ganjhu, Munesh Ganjhu, Pradeep Ram, Birbal Ganjhu, Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischya Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan, Bindu Ganjhu @ Bindeshwar Ganjhu and Bhikhan Ganjhu.

On 10.03.2016 charge sheet was submitted against the other accused persons before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. On 09.04.2017 on the prayer made by the Investigating Officer offences under Sections 16, 17, 20 and 23 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (herein after referred to as the UAP Act for the sake of brevity) were added. Since the offences involved a scheduled offence, in exercise of powers conferred u/s 6(3) read with Section 8 of the National Investigation Agency, Act 2008, the Central Government vide order da

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top