SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 1251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, Arun Kumar Rai, JJ.
Pradeep Ram @ Pradeep Verma S/o Devki Ram - Appellant
Versus
Union of India through National Investigating Agency, represented by Superintendent of Police - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 827 of 2024
Decided On : 06-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, Mr. Niranjan Kumar & Miss Akriti Priya, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. A. K. Das, Special P. P.

The court ruled that prolonged custody and unresolved trial mandates bail consideration, even in the face of stringent laws under UAPA.

Headnote:(A) National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 - Jurisdiction of NIA - Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 17, 18, 20, and 21 - Bail application of appellant accused of extortion linked to the TPC organization and recovery of ₹57,57,710/- - Trial pending, and precedent cases considered for similar rulings - Appellant’s lengthy incarceration acknowledged as a relevant factor for bail decision (Paras 11, 9, 10).

(B) Constitutional rights - The court emphasizes balancing statutory restrictions against constitutional rights, allowing for bail despite invocation of Section 43-D(5) UAPA if trial timelines are unreasonable (Para 10).

Facts of the case:
The appellant was implicated following a raid that recovered large sums of cash attributed to extortion activities related to a terrorist organization. Charges were filed under various sections of the IPC and UAPA, with the appellant in custody since 25.06.2016, complicating trial progress.

Findings of Court:
The court set aside the previous order rejecting bail, allowing it based on lengthy custody and the nature of allegations, directing release on bail conditions.

Issues: The court considered the timeline of the trial and the application of constitutional rights versus statutory restrictions in bail decisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that prolonged pre-trial incarceration and the nature of the allegations warranted reconsideration for bail, emphasizing rights to a speedy trial.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. order for bail and appeal outcome. (Para 1 , 2 , 13)
2. criminal conspiracy and levies by banned organization. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding bail and implications of charges. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. judicial observations on custody and bail conditions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

R. Mukhopadhyay, J.

Heard Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. A. K. Das, learned A.P.P. appearing for the NIA.

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 01.05.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No. 616 of 2024 in connection with R.C. Case No. 06/2018/NIA/DLI arising out of Special (NIA) case no. 3 of 2018 by Sri Madhuresh Kumar Verma, learned A.J.C. XVI cum Special Judge, NIA, Ranchi whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.

3. A written report was submitted by Ramdhari Singh, Sub Inspector of Police, posted at Simaria P.S. to the effect that on 10.01.2016 a secret information was received by the Superintendent of Police that in Amrapali Magadh Coal area in Tandwa some local people have formed an association which is related to the banned extremist outfit TPC. The members of such association were extracting levy from coal traders and DO holders by creating fear in the name of the extremists of TPC, namely Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohram Ji, Akraman Ji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischay Ganjhu, Bhikan Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan and Bindu Ghanju. It was also alleged that if any businessmen hesitates to pay levy, they are threatened by members of such organization and are also subjected to hardships. In order to verify the truthfulness or otherwise of such information a raiding party was constituted on the orders of Superintendent of Police, Chatra. A raid was conducted in the house of the President of the association Binod Kumar Ganjhu and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 91,75,890/- was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be submitted by Binod Kumar Ganjhu with respect to the recovery of such a huge amount of cash. From the house of Binod Kumar Ganjhu two persons were also apprehended who disclosed their names as Birbal Ganjhu and Munesh Ganjhu and on search of their persons a loaded Mauser pistol was recovered from the possession of Birbal Ganjhu while from the possession of Munesh Ganjhu a country made pistol and two live cartridges were recovered. Both had confessed of being associated with TPC organization. Binod Ganjhu had disclosed that he is the President of “Magadh Sanchalan Samittee” and the levy collected is sent to Gopal Singh Bhogta @ Brijesh Ganjhu and thereafter it is distributed between Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischyaji, Bhikan Ganjhu and Deepu Singh @ Bhikan. He had further disclosed that Bindu Ganjhu is a member of “Amrapali Sanchalan Samittee” who collects levy on behalf of TPC and since he is at present in Jail the collection of levy is being done by the appellant - Pradeep Ram. On such information a raid was conducted in the house of Pradeep Ram and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 57,57,710/- in cash was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be given by Pradeep Ram with respect to the cash recovered.

4. Based on the aforesaid allegations Tandwa P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 was instituted for the offences under Sections 414 , 384, 386, 387, 120B of the I.P.C., Section 25(1-b)(a), 26/35 of the ARMS ACT and Section 17 (1)(2) of Criminal Law Amendment Act against Binod Kumar Ganjhu, Munesh Ganjhu, Pradeep Ram, Birbal Ganjhu, Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischya Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan, Bindu Ganjhu @ Bindeshwar Ganjhu and Bhikan Ganjhu.

On 10.03.2016 charge sheet was submitted against the other accused persons before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. On 09.04.2017 on the prayer made by the Investigating Officer offences under Sections 16 , 17, 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top