SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 677

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, AMBUJ NATH, JJ.
Munesh Ganjhu, S/o Nirmal Ganjhu - Appellant 
Versus
Union of India - Respondent 
Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 555 of 2024
Decided on : 05-03-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Balaji Shrinivasan, Advocate, Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Spl. P.P.

Long periods of incarceration may warrant bail consideration, emphasizing constitutional rights over statutory restrictions where trials are unduly delayed.

Headnote:(A) Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 17, 18, and 20 - Arms Act - Sections 25(1-b)(a), 26, and 35 - Appeal for bail refusal - Court emphasizes the importance of long incarceration and trial delays in bail consideration - Importance of documentary evidence for invoking associations with terrorist groups highlighted. (Paras 5, 9, 10, 12)

(B) Bail - Principles applicable - In instances of extended custody exceeding a substantial part of a possible sentence, courts may evaluate the constitutional right to a speedy trial alongside statutory bail restrictions. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The appellant has been in custody for over six years and argues against bail based on insufficient evidence linking him to a terrorist organization, asserting he is a coal trader and social activist. (Paras 5, 6)

Findings of Court:
Considering the period of custody, along with similar precedents where bail was granted, the court decided to grant bail to the appellant. (Paras 12, 13)

Issues: The court examined whether prolonged custody and the trial delays warranted the granting of bail despite statutory restrictions. (Paras 9, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that long incarceration is a significant factor in deciding bail cases and should be balanced with statutory provisions of the UAPA. (Paras 9, 10)

Result: Appeal allowed; bail granted.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court analysis of custody duration. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. decision to grant bail. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT :

Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.

Heard Mr. Balaji Shrinivasan, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned Special P.P. for the respondent-NIA, Ranchi.

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.02.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No. 3184/2023, in connection with Special (NIA) Case No. 03/2018, corresponding to R.C. Case No. 06/2018/NIA/DLI, arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 02/2016 by Sri Madhuresh Kumar Verma, learned AJC-XVI-cum-Special Judge, NIA, Ranchi, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected.

3. A written report was submitted by Ramdhari Singh, Sub Inspector of Police, posted at Simaria P.S. to the effect that on 10.01.2016 a secret information was received by the Superintendent of Police that in Amrapali Magadh Coal area in Tandwa some local people have formed an association which is related to the banned extremist outfit TPC. The members of such association were extracting levy from coal traders and DO holders by creating fear in the name of the extremists of TPC, namely Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohram Ji, Akraman Ji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischay Ganjhu, Bhikan Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan and Bindu Ghanju. It was also alleged that if any businessmen hesitates to pay levy, they are threatened by members of such organization and are also subjected to hardships. In order to verify the truthfulness or otherwise of such information a raiding party was constituted on the orders of the Superintendent of Police, Chatra. A raid was conducted in the house of the President of the association Binod Kumar Ganjhu and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 91,75,890/- was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be submitted by Binod Kumar Ganjhu with respect to the recovery of such a huge amount of cash. From the house of Binod Kumar Ganjhu two persons were also apprehended who disclosed their names as Birbal Ganjhu and Munesh Ganjhu and on search of their persons a loaded Mauser pistol was recovered from the possession of Birbal Ganjhu while from the possession of Munesh Ganjhu a country made pistol and two live cartridges were recovered. Both had confessed of being associated with TPC organization. Binod Ganjhu had disclosed that he is the President of “Magadh Sanchalan Samittee” and the levy collected is sent to Gopal Singh Bhogta @ Brijesh Ganjhu and thereafter it is distributed between Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischyaji, Bhikan Ganjhu and Deepu Singh @ Bhikan. He had further disclosed that Bindu Ganjhu is a member of “Amrapali Sanchalan Samittee” who collects levy on behalf of TPC and since he is at present in Jail the collection of levy is being done by Pradeep Ram. On such information a raid was conducted in the house of Pradeep Ram and from under his bed as well as from an almirah Rs. 57,57,710/- in cash was recovered. No satisfactory explanation could be given by Pradeep Ram with respect to the cash recovered.

4. Based on the aforesaid allegations Tandwa P.S. Case No. 02 of 2016 was instituted for the offences under Sections 414, 384, 386, 387, 120B of the I.P.C., Section 25(1-b)(a), 26/35 of the Arms Act and Section 17 (1)(2) of Criminal Law Amendment Act against Binod Kumar Ganjhu, Munesh Ganjhu, Pradeep Ram, Birbal Ganjhu, Gopal Singh Bhokta @ Brijesh Ganjhu, Mukesh Ganjhu, Kohramji, Akramanji @ Ravindra Ganjhu, Anischya Ganjhu, Deepu Singh @ Bhikan, Bindu Ganjhu @ Bindeshwar Ganjhu and Bhikan Ganjhu.

On 10.03.2016 charge sheet was submitted against the other accused persons before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. On 09.04.2017 on the prayer made by the Investigating Officer offences under Sections 16, 17, 20 and 23 of the Unlawful Activ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top