SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 698

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANANDA SEN, SUBHASH CHAND, JJ.
Mukesh Topno, S/o. Late Lalo Topno - Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 120 of 2016
Decided On : 04-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ms. Bharti Kumari.
For the Respondent: Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, A.P.P.

IMPORTANT POINT
The court distinguished between murder and culpable homicide, concluding that the appellant's actions fell under Section 304 Part-I due to lack of intent and premeditation.

Headnote:

(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 304 - Conviction for murder - Appellant convicted under Section 302 and sentenced to life imprisonment - Evidence showed a single blow during a heated argument - Court found no premeditation or intent to kill, thus converting conviction to Section 304 Part-I with a sentence of 10 years. (Paras 21, 22)

(B) Mens Rea - The court emphasized the importance of intention in determining the nature of the offence, distinguishing between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder based on the circumstances and intent of the accused. (Paras 15, 16, 17)

Facts of the case:

The appellant, during a quarrel over money for a motorcycle, struck the deceased with a hockey stick, resulting in death. The incident occurred in a domestic setting with witnesses present.

Findings of Court:

The court concluded that the act was impulsive and occurred in a fit of anger, lacking intent for murder, thus justifying a lesser charge.

Issues: The main issue was whether the act constituted murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the appellant acted in the heat of passion without premeditation, leading to a conviction under Section 304 Part-I instead of Section 302.

Result: Appeal allowed in part; conviction modified.

JUDGMENT :

Ananda Sen, J.

Appellant has preferred this appeal against the Judgment of Conviction and Order of Sentence dated 23rd September, 2015 and 7th October, 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Simdega in Sessions Trial No.202 of 2011, whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and in default of payment of fine, appellant has to suffer three months’ additional simple imprisonment.

2. Jashmani Topno (informant) who is wife of the deceased and mother of the appellant, in her beyan stated that on 23.10.2011 at about 07.00 p.m. her husband Lalo Topno (deceased) and her son Mukesh Topno (appellant) were taking dinner in the house. In the meantime, her son started demanding money to purchase one motorcycle, which her husband refused on the ground that now he does not have money as he spent his entire money upon them. On this reply appellant, who was under the influence of alcohol, became ferocious and after leaving food, he rushed towards his room and brought one hockey stick and started assaulting her husband (deceased). She tried to save her husband, but the appellant struck hockey stick on the forehead of her husband, thus, he sustained injury, blood started oozing and he became senseless. On her alarm, neighbours reached. With their help, she brought her husband at Jaldega Hospital, where the doctor declared him as dead. She has further alleged that in the course of saving her husband, she also sustained injury on her head.

3. On the basis of the fardbeyan of the informant, Jaldega Police Station Case No.33 of 2011 dated 23.10.2011 was registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code against the appellant. After investigation, chargesheet was submitted, whereupon the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Simdega took cognizance of the offence and the case was committed to the Court of Sessions. Charge was framed against the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and trial was started.

5. Prosecution, in order to bring home the charge, had examined altogether 10 (ten) witnesses, namely, P.W.1 Rashmi Topno, P.W. Jina Topno, P.W.3 Jashmani Topno, P.W.4 Dr. Prabhu Sahay Linda, P.W.5 Albert Bilung, P.W.6 Tarsious Bage, P.W.7 Dr. Aradhana Sanga, P.W.8 Prithibi Harizan, P.W.9 Ajaj Ahmad Khan. One Court Witness, namely, C.W.1 Manas Kumar Das was also examined.

P.W.1 Rashmi Topno is the daughter of the deceased and sister of the appellant. She has stated in her evidence that her mother was serving food to her father and her brother, but in the meantime, the appellant demanded money from the deceased to purchase one motorcycle on which the deceased replied that now he does not have the money and on this issue, the appellant brought one hockey stick and hit on the head of the deceased and due to the injuries, he became unconscious. The deceased was brought to the hospital, where the deceased was declared dead. She further stated that the appellant used to consume alcohol.

P.W.2 is Jina Topno is the son of the deceased and brother of the appellant. He has stated in his evidence that on 23.10.2011 at about 07.00 p.m. her mother (P.W.3) was providing food to her father (deceased), to him and her brother Mukesh Topno (appellant), but in the meantime, the appellant demanded money from the deceased to purchase one motorcycle on which deceased replied that now he does not have the money as he has spent his entire money upon them. Out of rage, the appellant brought one hockey stick and hit on the head of the deceased and he died spontaneously. He further stated in his cross-examination that the appellant is mentally fit and he used to consume alcohol and appellant has given single blow on the head of the deceased.

P.W.3 Jashmani Topno is the informant. She is wife of the deceased and mother of the appellant. She has stated in he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top