Back
GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA, RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Suresh Ahirwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. brief factual context of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trial evidence and conviction details. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. appellant's defense arguments regarding witness reliability. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. state's support of the trial court's decision. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. legal principles and definitions concerning culpable homicide. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. final judgment and affirmation of the trial court's decision. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - The present appeal has been preferred by appellant challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 30- 11-2011 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Vidisha (MP) in Sessions Trial No.333 of 2010, whereby appellant has been convicted u/S 302 of IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous life imprisonment with fine of Rs.1,000/-, with default stipulation.
2. Prosecution case, in short, is that complainant Jitendra Kumar (PW1) lodged a report at Police Station Kurwai, District Vidisha on 25-08-2010 at around 23:30 hours stating therein that a previous enmity was going on with co-accused persons Parma, Asharam, Gulab and appellant Suresh in regard to murder of Kanchhedi Lal, father of appellant- accused S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
