SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 703

RAJESH SHANKAR
Sunil Kumar S/o Hanuman Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Ritu Kumar, Saurav Arun
For the Respondents: Manish Kumar, Gaurav Raj

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH SHANKAR, J.

1. Both these writ petitions have been preferred for quashing the order contained in Memo No. 737/J dated 16.06.2021 issued under the signature of the Principal Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer, Department of Law, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, whereby the petitioners’ claim for regularization has been rejected. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for regularization/absorption on Class III post i.e. Lower Division Clerk giving them age relaxation with all consequential benefits.

2. Argument advanced on behalf of the petitioners:

    (i) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners of both the writ petitions jointly submit that several posts were created by the Department of Law, Government of Jharkhand for the office of the Advocate General, Jharkhand vide Memo No. 1595 dated 14.07.2003 and the petitioner of W.P. (S) No. 2825 of 2021 (hereinafter referred as P1) and the petitioner of W.P. (S) No. 3511 of 2021 (hereinafter referred as P2) were appointed on the post of Routine Clerk (Now Lower Division Clerk) on contractual basis against the sanctioned and vacant posts in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top