Dharo Oraon vs State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 36

S. N. PATHAK
Dharo Oraon – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s. Rajendra Krishna, Ritu Kumar, Indrajit Sinha, Sumeet Gadodia, Saurav Arun, Sanjoy Piprawall, Amritansh Vats, Saurabh Shekhar, Shubha Jha, A.K. Sahani, Pratiush Lala, P.A. Khan, Ranjit Kumar, Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha, Ram Subhag Singh, Arpan Mishra, Rahul Kr. Singh, Shadab Bin Haque, Rajan Sahay, Nanda Kumari, Prakash Kumar, R.R. Tiwary, Vinay Kr. Tiwary, Arvind Kr. Singh, Dr. H. Waris, Md. Jalisur Rahman, Birendra Kumar, Ashutosh Prasad Josi, Khalida Haya Rashmi, Suraj Singh, Deepak Kumar Bharti, Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Atanu Banerjee, D.D. Saha, Radha Krishna Gupta, Bipin Kumar Prabhat, K.K. Mishra, Ujjal Sinha, Ranjan Kumar Singh, Ravi Kumar, Pankaj Srivastava, Rakesh Kumar, Leena Mukherjee, Vikram Sinha, Abhishek Srivastava, P.K. Choudhary, Anil Kumar Sinha, Advs.
For the Respondents:M/s Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate General, Mr. Sachin Kumar, Addl. AG-II, Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Addl. AG-III, Ms.Vandana Singh, Sr. SC-III, Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, AC to Sr. SC-III, Mr. Uttam Kr. Das, AC to GP-VI, Ms. Divya, AC to SC-III, Mr. Praveen Akhouri, SC(M)-I, Mr. Sharabhil Ahmed, AC to SC(M)-I, Mr. R.K. Singh, AC to GP-IV, Mr. Krishna Murari, Adv., Mr. K.K. Singh, SC-V, Mr. Deepak Kumar, AC to SC (L&C)-III, Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC(L&C)-II, Mr. Anshuman Kumar, AC to SC(L&C)-II, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, SC-II, Ms. Shaurya, AC to SC-II, Mr. Chandan Tiwary, AC to GA-I, Mr. Sharad Kaushal, AC to AAG-III, Mr. Nehru Mahto, AC to GP-IV, Mr. Krishna Kr. Bhatt, AC to SC-I, Mr. Raunak Sahay, AC to GP-V, Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC (M)-III, Mr. Faisal Allam, AC to SC(M)-III, Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, SC-IV, Mr. Divyam, AC to SC-IV, Ms. Pinky Tiwary, AC to AG, Mr. Rahul Dev, AC to SC(L&C)-III, Mr. Deepak Kr. AC to SC(L&C)-III, Mr. Amit Kumar, SC(M)-II, Ms. Shilpi, AC to SC(M)-II, Mr. Rohit, AC to AAG-I, Mr. Aman Kumar, AC to GP-I, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh, AC to GP-II, Mr. Manish Kumar, Sr. SC-II, Mr. Amit Mishra, AC to Sr. SC-II, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jha, AC to Sr. SC-II, Mr. Pradeep Kumar, AC to AAG-IV, Mr. Shishir Suman, AC to AAG-IV, Mr. Deepak Kumar, AC to SC (L&C)-III, Mr. Deepak Kr. Singh, AC to GP-IV, Ms. Khushboo Kumari, AC to GP-IV, Mr. J.F. Toppo, GA-V, Mrs. Moushmi Chatterjee, AC to GA-V, Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Roy, AC to GA-III, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, SC-I, Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Abdul Allam, Sr. Adv., Mr. Anil Kumar, ASGI, Mr. Vikash Kumar, CGC, Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, CGC.

JUDGMENT :

Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.

Prayer in all these writ petitions are diverse, may be overlapping in parts. However, the issues involved in all these writ petitions are similar and identical and as such they have been tagged together and are being heard and disposed of by this common Judgment.

PRAYERS:

2. All these petitioners either have prayed for quashment of orders denying their regularization in service or for a direction upon the respondents to regularize their services, who are/were working continuously for more than ten years in their respective Offices/ Departments/University/Instrumentalities of the State, in the light of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Vrs. State of Jharkhand & Ors., reported in (2018) 8 SCC 238, as also in view of the Regularization Policy framed by the Government of Jharkhand in the year 2015, amended in the year 2019.

THE FACTS.

3. For the sake of brevity it would be apposite to narrate the brief facts of the case which has given rise to the present disputes. In most of the cases, the petitioners are ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 36

S. N. PATHAKDharo Oraon – AppellantVersusState of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Jharkhand – Respondent

Cases Referred (32)

S. N. PATHAK
Dharo Oraon – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Jharkhand – Respondent