SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Ajay Shankar Ram, Son of Late Kameshwar Baitha - Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
W.P. (S) No. 3321 of 2022
Decided on : 18-11-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mihir Kunal Ekka

Promotion eligibility must be based on fairness and non-arbitrariness, ensuring all eligible candidates are considered regardless of category.

Headnote:(A) Jharkhand Engineering Service Appointment Rules, 2016 - Promotion eligibility - The petitioner, a Junior Engineer, was denied promotion to Assistant Engineer despite eligibility and vacancies in the SC category, while juniors from the ST category were promoted. The court found this arbitrary and directed promotion from 20.11.2018. (Paras 3, 14)

(B) Administrative Law - Principles of fairness and non-arbitrariness - The court emphasized that non-consideration of eligible candidates from the SC category when vacancies existed is arbitrary and violates principles of fairness. (Paras 12, 14)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was appointed as Junior Engineer on 20.11.2007 and became eligible for promotion in 2012. Despite vacancies in the SC category, he was not promoted until 2023, while juniors from the ST category were promoted in 2018. (Paras 3, 4)

Findings of Court:
The court held that the petitioner was eligible for promotion in 2012 and that the delay and non-consideration for promotion were arbitrary. The promotion was to be backdated to 20.11.2018. (Paras 14, 15)

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioner was eligible for promotion in 2012 and whether the non-consideration of SC candidates for promotion was arbitrary. (Paras 10, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the failure to promote the petitioner despite eligibility and vacancies constituted arbitrary action, violating principles of administrative fairness. (Paras 14, 15)

Result: Writ application allowed; promotion to be granted from 20.11.2018.

JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The instant writ application has been initially preferred by the writ petitioner, praying, inter-alia, for a direction upon the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner for promotion from the post of Junior Engineer to the post of Assistant Engineer. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner was granted promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer, vide departmental notification dated 30.12.2023, the effect of which was given from the date of joining. Being aggrieved, the petitioner preferred one Interlocutory Application, being I.A. No.2818 of 2024, praying for an amendment in the prayer and pleading of the writ petition and prayer No.1(a) was sought to be added. The interlocutory application was allowed, vide order dated 29.04.2024. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed amended writ petition. The prayer allowed to be added, vide amendment application (interlocutory application), was to quash the decision of the DPC and further, to give retrospective effect to the promotion, notified by the department on 30.12.2023, from the post of Junior Engineer to the post of Assistant Engineer.

3. The brief facts of the case as per the pleadings are that there was vacancy in the cadre of Assistant Engineer in the department of Water Resources and the petitioner was eligible to be promoted. The petitioner was appointed to the post of Junior Engineer on 20.11.2007. He completed five years of regular service on 20.11.2012. On this date, he became eligible for consideration for promotion to the higher post of Assistant Engineer. At that point of time though there was vacancy in the cadre of Assistant Engineer in the department of Water Resources, and the petitioner was eligible to be promoted; but the petitioner was thereafter put to discharge his services in In-charge capacity.

Further fact of the case is that in the category of Schedule Caste, no promotion had taken place since the creation of State of Jharkhand and the first time, when such promotion had taken, was only on 30.12.2023. To substantiate this fact, the petitioner has brought on record Annexure-6, which is copy of the details relating to the petitioner which was placed before the DPC. The document clearly discloses that there has been no promotion in the SC category quota of the post of Assistant Engineer, after the creation of State of Jharkhand and these SC category posts, total 8 in number have remained vacant since then. During the pendency of this writ application the respondents have granted promotion to the petitioner in pursuance of notification dated 31.12.2023 with benefits from the date of joining and not from the time when petitioner ought to have been promoted. Hence the petitioner is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have given promotion to the juniors, in the common gradation list, therefore, the petitioner is also entitled for promotion, at least from the date when they have been granted promotion. From perusal of para-29 and Annexure-8 annexed with it, a gradation list would come to force, in which it can be seen that the petitioner, who appears at seniority position No.2090, was not granted promotion; whereas, the juniors, who are in schedule tribe category, starting from seniority position No.2102 onwards, have been granted promotion.

He further submits that these promotions have been granted in pursuance to Annexure-9, i.e. departmental notification dated 20.11.2018. Therefore, it is clear that some of the candidates from the common gradation list, have been granted promotion to the higher post of Assistant Engineer.

5. Learned counsel contends that the employees, who have been granted promotion, are the candidates of ST category and the petitioner is a candidate of SC category, when the availability of vacancy in ST category pursued by the respondents to grant promotion to the above candidates (ST), then the petitioner who is in SC categ

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top