SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 1046

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Bikram Mandal S/o Shri Kuber - Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand - Respondent
W.P. (S) No. 7659 of 2023
Decided On : 06-12-2024


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Rupesh Singh, Amrendra Pradhan
For the Respondent: Ashutosh Anand

Promotion decisions must adhere to principles of natural justice, including adequate communication of requirements; discriminatory practices violate constitutional rights.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 21 - Promotion in service - Petitioners sought promotion to Assistant Engineer (Civil) and challenged rejection of representation based on non-submission of documents - The Court found that the petitioners were not adequately informed about the document requirement and were unjustly discriminated against - Court emphasized the importance of proper communication regarding promotion requisites. (Paras 5, 10, 13)

(B) Natural Justice - Principles of natural justice must be adhered to in promotional processes - Court ruled that promotional decisions made without fair notice are arbitrary and violate constitutional rights. (Paras 7, 10)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, appointed as Junior Engineers, sought promotion after juniors were granted promotions unfairly, arguing violation of their rights due to lack of proper notice regarding required documentation.

Findings of Court:
Orders rejecting the petitioners' representations were quashed; respondents must grant promotions retroactively with all benefits.

Issues: Key issues included the adequacy of notice provided to the petitioners regarding promotional prerequisites and the legality of promoting juniors while excluding the petitioners.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the failure to communicate requirements suitably breaches principles of natural justice and warranted quashing the rejection orders.

Result: Writ application allowed, promotion granted.

Table of Content
1. promotion eligibility of petitioners (Para 2 , 3)
2. contentions on promotion denial (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. improper communication regarding promotion (Para 8 , 9)
4. non-submission of documents as a disqualification (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court's directive on promotion and consequence (Para 14)

JUDGMENT :

DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioners for the following reliefs:

(a) Commanding upon the respondents to grant promotion to the petitioners to the promotional post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) with Pay-scale PB-II, Rs.9,300-34,800/-, Grade Pay of Rs.5,400/- (revised pay-scale Pay Matrix Level 9) under Jharkhand Engineering Services Category 2 since the date when similarly situated or juniors were granted promotion to the said post, with all consequential benefits including monetary benefits.

(b) Quashing/setting aside, with all consequences, the reasoned orders dated 18.9.2023 (as contained in Annexure-8 series) issued under the signature of the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi whereby the petitioners’ respective representations dated 27.6.2023 (contained in Annexure-7 series) stood rejected.

(c) Quashing/setting aside, with all consequences, the notification contained in memo no.1421(S) dated 22.3.2023 (Annexure-4) issued under the signature of the Deputy Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand to the extent it excludes the name of the petitioners as promotees.

3. The brief facts of the case are that initially Jharkhand Public Service Commission ("JPSC" in short) conducted Combined Junior Engineer Recruitment Examination, 2012 in which the petitioners stood successful. Thereafter, JPSC recommended the petitioners for appointment on the post of Junior Engineer (Civil). In terms of the recommendation of JPSC, the Engineer-in- Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi issued respective office orders appointing the petitioners under the cadre of Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand in the pay-scale of PB-11-Rs.9,300- 34,800/- with grade pay of Rs.4,200/-. In terms of the aforesaid orders the petitioners submitted their joining at the respective places.Thereafter, the Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi through its Under Secretary issued an order publishing a consolidated seniority list of Junior Engineers, which is contained in memo no.5506(S) dated 13.11.2019, which was provisional. Thereafter, a final seniority list was published vide order dated 23.02.2021.Subsequently, the JPSC convened a Departmental Promotion Committee (‘DPC’ in short) meeting on 14.03.2023; wherein a recommendation was made for promotion of Junior Engineers to the post of Assistant Engineer. In terms of the said recommendation the Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand issued a notification contained in memo no.1422(S) dated 22.03.2023, which has been issued under the signature of the Deputy Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand; whereby list of Junior engineers were promoted to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) at the pay-scale of PB-II, Rs.9,300-34,800/- with Grade Pay of Rs.5,400/- (revised pay-scale Pay-Matrix Level-9). In the said notification dated 22.03.2023, the juniors have been promoted to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil).

4. Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioner made written representation dated 05.04.2023 to the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, but in vain. Subsequently the petitioners moved this Court in W.P.(S) No.2332 of 2023 raising their grievance and this court has disposed of the aforesaid writ petition with a liberty to the petitioners to make a fresh representation and the respondents were directed to consider by speaking and reasoned order taking into consideration the fact that several juniors

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top