SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 828

M. S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Shivam Stone Works – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Kanti Kumar Ojha, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III

JUDGMENT :

M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J. (Oral)

1. This writ petition is filed challenging the order dt. 30.07.2024 passed by the Mines Commissioner, Ranchi in Revision Case No. 99 of 2023 filed by the petitioner.

The said revision case had been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dt. 06.07.2023 of the Deputy Commissioner, Pakur embodied in Memo No. 2171 dt. 29.09.2023 and issued under the signature of the District Mining Officer, Pakur.

In that order the petitioner was informed about rejection of his application for grant of fresh mining lease dt. 25.09.2019 and also application dt. 11.02.2020 on the ground of non-submission of Environmental Clearance Certificate within the statutory time limit.

2. In the impugned order passed in Revision Case No. 99 of 2023, the author of the said order i.e. the Mines Commissioner records that the primary order dt. 06.07.2023 has been passed by himself when he was the adjudicating authority i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Pakur. He, therefore, states that since he himself passed the primary order as a primary authority, he cannot hear and pass any order on the same set of issues as an appellate authority and, therefore, he has disposed of the re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top