Back
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Sanjay Vidrohi @ Sanjay Kumar Vidrohi – Appellant
Versus
Ranchi Municipal Corporation, through its Municipal Commissioner – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Deepak Roshan, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Since in both the writ petitions, order dated 27th May, 2022 passed in Misc. Appeal No. 06 of 2018 by Appellate Tribunal, Ranchi Regional Development Authority (for short ‘RRDA’) is under challenge, same were heard together and being disposed of by this common Judgment.
3. At the outset, it may be noted that writ applications were earlier listed on 28th November, 2024 and on the said date, arguments were advanced by the parties in W.P.(C) No. 2671 of 2022, but counsel for Respondent No.5, Mr. Shambhu Nath Singh did not appear and since writ petitions were analogous, Judgment was reserved. However, after Judgment was reserved, Mr. Shambhu Nath Singh appeared before this court and requested that he may be granted opportunity to advance his arguments as he could not appear due to medical emergency and, accordingly, on his request, although Judgment was reserved in both the writ petitions, the matter was again posted on 29th November, 2024. However, the matter could not be taken up that day.
Subsequently, the matter was listed on 03.12.2024 upon mentioning, but counsel for the respondent No.5 in W.P.(C) No. 2671/2022 a
The court affirmed the authority of the Municipal Commissioner to regularize construction and condemned the complainant's repeated legal challenges as an abuse of process.
The court emphasized the importance of planned development and the need to address unauthorized constructions. It also highlighted the right of the petitioners, as owners, to be heard before the orde....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
