SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 39

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Rajesh Kumar, S/o. Srimohan Yadav - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Jharkhand - Respondent
W.P. (Cr.) No.106 of 2025
Decided On : 11-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant  :Ms. Kabisha Goenka, Advocate Mr. Ashish Kr. Thakur, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA-III Mr. Deepankar, AC to GA-III

The Deputy Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to confiscate the truck under Rule 11(v) of the Jharkhand Mineral Rules, which was declared ultra vires, rendering the confiscation order invalid.

Headnote:

(A) Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017 - Rule 11(v) - Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petition filed against the confiscation order of a truck due to illegal mineral transportation based on forged documents - The court found that Rule 11(v) was struck down as ultra vires to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, rendering the confiscation order invalid. (Paras 4, 5, 6)

(B) Jurisdiction - The Deputy Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to order confiscation under the struck-down rule, thus the order was quashed. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner’s truck was confiscated based on allegations of illegal mineral transportation using forged challans, without a proper hearing.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the confiscation order was made without jurisdiction as the empowering rule was declared invalid.

Issues: The main issue was whether the Deputy Commissioner had the authority to confiscate the vehicle under the struck-down rule.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that since the rule under which the confiscation was ordered was ultra vires, the order itself was invalid and unsustainable in law.

Result: The order dated 16.08.2022 is quashed and set aside.

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

Heard the parties.

2. This Writ Petition (Cr.) has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for quashing the order dated 16.08.2022 passed in Confiscation Case No.03 of 2022-23 by the District Magistrate-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj by which the truck of the petitioner bearing Registration No. BR-10GB-2453 has been ordered to be confiscated and to be auctioned in exercise of the power under Rule 11(v) of the Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017.

3. The brief facts of the case is that on the basis of the written report inter alia submitted by the District Mining Officer, Sahibganj alleging therein that the said truck of the petitioner was involved in transportation of minerals illegally on the basis of the forged challans, the minerals along with the said truck has been seized by the District Mining Officer, Sahibganj and though show-cause notice was issued by the District Mining Officer, Sahibganj, to the vehicle’s owner, the same has not been responded to by the petitioner. The District Mining Officer, Sahibganj moved an application to the District inter alia Magistrate-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj for confiscation of the said vehicle along with other vehicles.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner in respect to the confiscation of the vehicle of the petitioner being Truck bearing Registration No. BR-10GB-2453, the respondent No.1 passed the impugned order dated 16.08.2022 in confiscation case No.03 of 2022-23 directing for subsequent auction of the said truck of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that the impugned order in exercise of the power under Rule 11(v) of the Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017 is not sustainable in the eyes of law because the Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj got no jurisdiction to exercise the power under Rule 11(v) of the Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017; in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s Aditya Enterprises & Others vs. The State of Jharkhand & Others and allied cases passed in W.P.(C) No.6788 of 2023 and allied cases dated 22.07.2024 wherein it has been categorically held by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this court that Rule 11(v) of the Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017 has been ultra vires struck down being to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 . Thus, Rule 11(v) of the said Rules so far as it vests power to the Deputy Commissioner of each district to be the Confiscating Authority ultra vires was held to be the parent act and the constitution and has been struck down by the Division Bench of this court. Hence, it is submitted that the corollary of such judgment of the Division Bench of this court is that the Deputy Commissioner of any of the district in the State of Jharkhand has no power to initiate and decide the confiscation proceeding as the power vested upon the Deputy Commissioner has been struck down. Hence, it is submitted that the order dated 16.08.2022 passed in exercise of the said power be quashed and set aside.

5. Learned counsel for the State fairly submits that in view of the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this court in the case of M/s Aditya Enterprises & Others vs. The State of Jharkhand & Others along with allied cases passed in W.P.(C) No.6788 of 2023 and allied cases dated 22.07.2024 (supra), wherein it has been categorically held by the Division Bench of this inter alia court that the power vested upon the Deputy Commissioner of each of the district of the State of Jharkhand by Rule 11(v) of the Jharkhand Minerals ultra (Prevention of illegal Mining, Transportat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top