SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 74

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY PRASAD, J
Shailendra Kumar Jaiswal, S/o Bhim Prasad Jaiswal - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Jharkhand - Respondent
Cr.Rev. 125 Of 2025
Decided On : 27-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Shadab Eqbal, Advocate
For the State : Mr. P. D. Agarwal, Spl.P.P
For the Respondent:Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate

Provisional bail can be granted during the pendency of a criminal revision when the petitioner expresses willingness to settle the dispute and meets specified conditions.

Headnote:

(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Criminal Revision filed against dismissal of Criminal Appeal affirming conviction under Section 138 and order of sentence - Petitioner convicted and sentenced to seven months imprisonment and directed to pay compensation of Rs. 1,10,000/- to complainant. (Paras 1-8)

(B) Provisional Bail - Petitioner applied for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of the Criminal Revision - Court granted provisional bail for six months on specific conditions regarding deposit of compensation. (Paras 4-7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was convicted for dishonor of a cheque under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and sentenced to seven months imprisonment while also being ordered to pay Rs. 1,10,000/- as compensation to the complainant. The petitioner sought provisional bail, claiming readiness to settle the dispute.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the I.A. for provisional bail, subject to conditions including the deposit of Rs. 25,000/- as part of settlement.

Issues: The primary issues were the legality of the lower court's judgment and the petitioner's request for provisional bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found merit in granting provisional bail considering the circumstances and the petitioner's willingness to settle.

Result: I.A. No. 1507 of 2025 is allowed and disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY PRASAD, J.

I. A. No. 1507 of 2025

The present Criminal Revision has been filed challenging the judgment dated 30.08.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 148 of 2022 by Sri Anjanee Anuj, learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Dhanbad by which learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Dhanbad has dismissed the Criminal Appeal No. 148 of 2022 by affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.11.2022 passed by st Shri Suresh Oraon, Judicial Magistrate, 1 Class, Dhanbad in connection with Complaint Case No. 22 of 2019 by which the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the N. I. Act and sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of seven (7) months and further directed to pay Rs. 1,10,000/- to the complainant as compensation.

2. The instant I.A. No. 1507 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for suspension of sentence and for grant of bail during pendency of the present Criminal Revision.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that judgements and order passed by the learned Court below are illegal and arbitrary and not sustainable in the eye of law. It is submitted that the petitioner is ready to settle the dispute with the opposite party no. 2 and for the present he is ready to deposit Demand Draft of Rs. 25,000/- in the name of opposite party no. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2025 and as such, he may be enlarged on bail.

5. No objection raised by the learned counsel for the State. 6. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has also raised objection.

7. Considering the facts and in the circumstances of the case, during pendency of this Criminal Revision, the petitioner namely Shailendra Kumar Jaiswal is directed to be released on provisional bail for a period of six (6) months from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of st Shri Suresh Oraon, Judicial Magistrate, 1 Class, Dhanbad/or his Successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 22 of 2019 subject to condition that the petitioner will deposit Demand Draft of Rs. 25,000/- in the name of opposite party no. 2 at the time of furnishing the bail bonds, which may be handed over to the opposite party no. 2 by the learned Court below.

8. Thus, I.A. No. 1507 of 2025 is allowed and stands disposed of.

9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Court below.

10. Call for the scanned copy of the Lower Court Records.

11. Put up this case on 27.03.2025.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top