SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 780

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY PRASAD, J.
Shailendra Kumar Jaiswal, S/o Bhim Prasad Jaiswal - Petitioner 
Versus 
The State of Jharkhand and Anr. – Opp. Parties
Cr. Revision No. 148 of 2025
Decided On : 27-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shadab Eqbal, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties :Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.PP., Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate

Provisional bail granted under conditions, emphasizing readiness to settle and legality of prior judgments in conviction under Section 138 of the N.I. Act.

Headnote:

(A) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Criminal Revision challenging conviction for dishonor of cheque - Petitioner convicted and sentenced to nine months' imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 3,00,000/- as compensation - Conviction affirmed by Additional Sessions Judge - Court emphasized legality of prior judgments and the petitioner's readiness to settle the dispute. (Paras 1, 4, 7)

(B) Bail - Provisional bail granted for six months on conditions - Petitioner to deposit Rs. 50,000/- to the opposite party as part of bail conditions. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the N.I. Act for dishonoring a cheque and sentenced to nine months in prison, along with compensation to the complainant. The petitioner sought bail pending appeal, expressing readiness to settle the matter.

Findings of Court:
The court found merit in granting provisional bail to the petitioner under specific conditions, including a monetary deposit to the opposite party.

Issues: The main issues were the legality of the prior judgments and the appropriateness of granting bail during the revision proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the judgments from the lower courts were not arbitrary and upheld the conviction, while also allowing provisional bail under specified conditions.

Result: I.A. No. 1506 of 2025 is allowed.

JUDGMENT :

(SANJAY PRASAD, J.)

I. A. No. 1506 of 2025

The present Criminal Revision has been filed challenging the judgment dated 02.08.2024 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2022 by Sri Durgesh C. Awasthi, learned Additional Sessions Judge-XVI, Dhanbad by which learned Additional Sessions Judge-XVI, Dhanbad has dismissed the Criminal Appeal No. 144 of 2022 by affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18.11.2022 passed by Shri Suresh Oraon, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Complaint Case No. 3728 of 2018 by which the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the N. I. Act and sentenced to undergo S.I. for a period of nine (9) months and further directed to pay Rs. 3,00,000/- to the complainant as compensation.

2. The instant I.A. No. 1506 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for suspension of sentence and for grant of bail during pendency of the present Criminal Revision.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that judgements and order passed by the learned Court below are illegal and arbitrary and not sustainable in the eye of law. It is submitted that the petitioner is ready to settle the dispute with the opposite party no. 2 and for the present he is ready to deposit Demand Draft of Rs. 50,000/- in the name of opposite party no. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2025 and as such, he may be enlarged on bail.

5. No objection raised by the learned counsel for the State.

6. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has also raised objection.

7. Considering the facts and in the circumstances of the case, during pendency of this Criminal Revision, the petitioner namely Shailendra Kumar Jaiswal is directed to be released on provisional bail for a period of six (6) months from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Suresh Oraon, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad/or his Successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 3728 of 2018 subject to condition that the petitioner will deposit Demand Draft of Rs. 50,000/- in the name of opposite party no. 2 at the time of furnishing the bail bonds, which may be handed over to the opposite party no. 2 by the learned Court below.

8. Thus, I.A. No. 1506 of 2025 is allowed and stands disposed of.

9. I.A. No. 11417 of 2024 exemption for surrender is dismissed as having been infructuous in view of the arresting of the petitioner.

10. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Court below.

Cr. Revision No. 148 of 2025

11. Call for the scanned copy of the Lower Court Records.

12. Put up this case on 27.03.2025.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top