IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J., SANJAY PRASAD, J.
Aditya Yadav @ Aditya Kumar Yadav son of Dasrath Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction judgment details. (Para 1) |
| 2. challenge to conviction based on lack of eyewitness. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments on insufficient evidence and co-convicts. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. state's opposition based on evidence and confessions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. summary of arguments for appeal. (Para 13) |
| 6. court's observation on bail post-conviction. (Para 14 , 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. legal standards for suspension of sentence. (Para 16 , 19 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. court considerations for applying parity. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 9. application of legal principles to the case. (Para 24 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. evidence of confessions and culpability. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 11. final decision on suspension of sentence. (Para 34) |
| 12. conclusion of the interlocutory application. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for suspension sentence in connection with judgment of conviction and sentence dated 03.02.2024 and 07.02.2024 respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Sahibganj in Session Trial Case No. 14 of 2022, arising out of Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 15 of 2021, Whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convict
Omprakash Sahni v. Jai Shankar Chaudhary
Preet Pal Singh vs. State of U.P.
Tarun Kumar vs. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement
In murder convictions, post-conviction suspension of sentence is rare; courts assess evidence's prima facie durability and must have compelling justifications.
Suspension of sentence and release on bail – Parameters governing suspension of sentence post-conviction are qualitatively distinct from those applicable at stage of pre-trial bail – Such relief can ....
Suspending a sentence for a serious offence like murder requires a rare demonstration of exceptional circumstances, without re-evaluating evidence during bail applications.
A litigant must approach the court with clean hands; suppression of material facts disqualifies them from receiving judicial relief.
The appellant's conviction under the POCSO Act was upheld as the victim was underage at the time of the offense, notwithstanding the alteration in charges, which did not prejudice the appellant's def....
(1) Suspension of sentence and release on bail – Accused is presumed to be innocent till he is held guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction – Once accused is held guilty, presumption of innocence....
Suspension of sentence requires clear demonstration of trial errors or reasonable doubts about conviction, which the applicant failed to establish.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.