Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J., SANJAY PRASAD, J.
Aditya Yadav @ Aditya Kumar Yadav son of Dasrath Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for suspension sentence in connection with judgment of conviction and sentence dated 03.02.2024 and 07.02.2024 respectively passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Sahibganj in Session Trial Case No. 14 of 2022, arising out of Mirzachouki P.S. Case No. 15 of 2021, Whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Sections 302 ,201,364/34 of the Indian Penal Coade and under Section 27 of ARMS ACT and directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.50,000/- for the offence under Section 302 /34 of I.P.C and in default of fine further S.I. for one year, further directed to undergo R.I. for 10 years and a fine of Rs.20,000/- for the offence under Section 364 /34 of I.P.C. and in default of fine further S.I. for 6 months. The appellant has been further directed to undergo R.I. for 7 years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of fine further S.I. for 6 months for the offence under Section 201 /34 of I.P.C. and R.I. for 10 years and a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of fine further S.I. for 6 months for the offence under Section 27 of ARMS ACT .
Submission of the learned cou
In murder convictions, post-conviction suspension of sentence is rare; courts assess evidence's prima facie durability and must have compelling justifications.
Suspension of sentence and release on bail – Parameters governing suspension of sentence post-conviction are qualitatively distinct from those applicable at stage of pre-trial bail – Such relief can ....
Suspending a sentence for a serious offence like murder requires a rare demonstration of exceptional circumstances, without re-evaluating evidence during bail applications.
A litigant must approach the court with clean hands; suppression of material facts disqualifies them from receiving judicial relief.
The appellant's conviction under the POCSO Act was upheld as the victim was underage at the time of the offense, notwithstanding the alteration in charges, which did not prejudice the appellant's def....
(1) Suspension of sentence and release on bail – Accused is presumed to be innocent till he is held guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction – Once accused is held guilty, presumption of innocence....
Suspension of sentence requires clear demonstration of trial errors or reasonable doubts about conviction, which the applicant failed to establish.
Under UA(P) Act Section 43D(5), bail denied if charge-sheet shows prima facie true accusations of terrorist gang involvement; custody/delay insufficient absent changed circumstances; parity only for ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
