SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 378

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, R. MAHADEVAN
Dhan Jee Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Saket Singh, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sarvshree, AOR Ms. Somyashree, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Pranjal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kashif Irshad Khan, Adv. Mr. Manu Arya, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashish Anshuman, Adv. Mr. Chandan Malav, Adv. Ms. Astha Singh, AOR

Judgement Key Points

What is the appropriate standard and exceptional circumstances required for suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. post-conviction?

What factors and evidentiary considerations may not be reappreciated by the appellate court when exercising power under Section 389 Cr.P.C.?

What is the role of criminal antecedents and credible ocular evidence in deciding whether to suspend the sentence in a case of murder (Section 302 IPC)?


JUDGMENT :

R. MAHADEVAN, J.

Leave granted in both the cases.

Criminal Appeal No.1864/2026 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 4241 of 2025

2. The instant Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant / informant challenging the judgment and order dated 22.11.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna1[Hereinafter referred to as “the High Court”] in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1180 of 2018, whereby, the High Court, during the pendency of the appeal, suspended the sentence of life imprisonment awarded to Respondent No. 2, Shekhar Pandey @ Shekhar Suman Pandey @ Sintu Pandey @ Situ and released him on bail.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on the basis of the written information (fardbayan) of the appellant / informant, namely Dhan Jee Pandey, P. S. Case No. Buxar (I) 4 of 2016 dated 04.01.2016 was registered under Sections 302, 307, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 18602[For short, “IPC”] and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 against Respondent No. 2 and other accused persons. It is alleged that on 04.01.2016 at about 04.15 p.m., the appellant, along with his elder brother (deceased), Ramashankar Pandey @ Jhamman Pandey, was proceeding towards his village on a motorcycle. On the wa

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top