IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.
Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited through its authorized signatory Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary and ors. - Respondents
W. P. (C) No. 5477 of 2021, W. P. (C) No. 5544 of 2021
Decided On : 14-02-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims for subsidies initiated under expired policies require adherence to initial promises. (Para 1) |
| 2. claims for subsidy under industrial policies. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. details of subsidy claims and grievances. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 4. contested application of policies and incentives. (Para 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. respondents' defense on applicable policies. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. incentives cannot be denied based on interpretations of production timelines. (Para 16) |
| 7. analysis of industrial policy effectiveness. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. court's reasoning regarding promise and cutoff dates. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.
Heard, learned counsel for the parties.
1. Since both the aforesaid Writ Petitions raise similar issues, therefore, they are heard together and will be disposed of by common order.
2. Petitioners claim subsidy on the basis of Jharkhand Industrial Policy, 2001 under the Scheme known as Special Package for Mega Industries, 2003.
3. W.P.(C) No.5477 of 2021 has been filed for a direction to the respondent-authorities for paying the deficit VAT/ CST to the tune of Rs.162 Crores which has not been paid as per the Industrial Policy, 2001 read with Special Package, 2003 for mega industries.
Whereas W.P.(C) No.5544 of 2021 has been filed for payment of Capital investment subsidy of about Rs.4 Crores under the same scheme.
CASE OF THE PETITIONER
4. Petitioner’s claim under the Industrial Policy, 2001 are under following heads, namely, (i) Reimbursement of VAT subsidy of 75% on fixed capital investment for the period of April to June 2017; (b) Subsidy of 100% on SGST from July 2017 to March 2019 (which came into force on 1.7.2017) and; (iii) CST subsidy on fixed capital investment for a period of 7 years in terms of Jharkhand Industrial Policy, 2001.
5. Petitioner company is a manufacturing unit of Cement and started its commercial production from its unit situated at Bokaro from 20.05.2011. The claim hinges upon Industrial Policy, 2001 read with Scheme for Mega Unit and Project Incentive Rule, 2005. The salient features of the said Scheme can be summed up as under :-
(a) The Government of Jharkhand on 10.06.2003 vide Memorandum No.1885 formulated a scheme known as “Special Package for Mega Industries”, which inter-alia provided for capital investment incentive of Rs.4 Crores for industrial unit Category A at 5% of the fixed capital investment with a maximum amount of Rs.4 crores;
(b) Amount equivalent to 75% of the commercial taxes so received from the unit in a financial year to be payable to the unit in the form of capital investment incentive for the next financial year. Incentive to be paid with effect from the date of commencement of commercial production for Category-A. It was applicable for 7 years subject to maximum limit of capital investment incentive of75% of the total fixed capital investment made by the unit of this category up to the date of commercial production. As per the Policy, Bokaro Cement Unit comes under Category-A.
(c) Under Clause 29.11 of the Jharkhand Industrial Policy, 2001, special packages for new projects with an investment of more than Rs.50 Crores on case-to-case basis was provided.
6. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the subsidies have been released in favour of the Petitioner as per the Industrial Policy, 2012 and not as per Special Mega Package, 2003. Petitioner has been paid Rs.163.45 Crores as per Industrial Policy, 2012 and have been deprived of the incentive as per the Special Mega Package, 2003. Loss is tabulated as under :-
| Sl. No. | Type | Amount (in Crores) |
|---|---|---|
| (a) | VAT/ SGST | Rs. 161.22 |
| (b) | CST Subsidy | Rs. 1.20 |
| (c) | Capital Subsidy | Rs. 4.00 |
7. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner(s) that the commercial industrial production started from May, 2011, however it has not been disputed by the State that the production had started from December, 2011.
8. The Industrial Policy, 2001 read with the Special Mega Package, 2003 was followed up to 31st March, 2011. Respondent
State of Bihar v. Suprabhat Steel Ltd.
State of Orrisa Vs. Tata Sponge Iron Ltd.
Chowgule & Co. Ltd. v. Asstt. Director General of Foreign Trade
Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Manubhai Dharmasinhbhai Gajera
The absence of a cut-off date in the Special Mega Package allows entitlement to incentives regardless of the commercial production start date relative to the previous policy's expiry.
Point of Law : Notification cannot be construed as having retrospective or retroactive effect to whittle down the accrued rights in favour of the Respondent units which were entitled to rebate.
A new industrial unit under the industrial policy of 1989 is established if fixed capital investments occur post-effective date, independent from existing units; prior subsidies do not limit new unit....
The State is bound by its promises under the Industrial Policy, and failure to issue enabling notifications for incentives constitutes arbitrary action, invoking the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
The principle of estoppel prevents authorities from withdrawing subsidies once granted, especially when businesses have acted on the original policy.
Subsequent amendments to the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy do not apply retrospectively, and promised incentives must be honored for the entire entitlement period.
Existing units commencing production before new industrial policy but not availing prior incentives eligible under amended transitional Clause 8(b); prior clearances create vested rights invoking pro....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.