SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 681

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
A. ABHISHEK REDDY, J.
Shree Saibaba Plasto Products Private Limited – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8907 of 2023
Decided On : 19-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Abhishek Kumar
For the Respondent: Vikash Kumar

Subsequent amendments to the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy do not apply retrospectively, and promised incentives must be honored for the entire entitlement period.

Headnote:(A) Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011 - Amendment by Resolution No. 108 dated 20.01.2020 - Reimbursement of VAT/SGST - Petitioner denied reimbursement for April 2021 to September 2021 on grounds of production below 25% - Court held that subsequent amendments do not apply retrospectively to the petitioner who was entitled to benefits under the original policy. (Paras 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)

(B) Promissory Estoppel - The principle that once an incentive has been promised under a scheme, it must be honored until the end of the specified period, regardless of subsequent amendments. (Paras 6, 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner established a plastic furniture unit under the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011, and was initially granted reimbursement of VAT/SGST. The claim for reimbursement for April 2021 to September 2021 was denied based on production levels.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the denial of reimbursement was contrary to the original policy and directed the authorities to calculate and pay the reimbursement.

Issues: Whether the amendment to the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy applies retrospectively and the validity of the denial of reimbursement based on production levels.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the petitioner is entitled to the promised incentives under the original policy, and subsequent amendments cannot affect already accrued rights.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

A. ABHISHEK REDDY, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:

    “(vi) For issuing a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the Respondent Authorities to bring on record orders or letters by which the claim of the petitioner under the head of reimbursement of VAT/SGST paid has been denied for the period April 2021 to September 2021 and the ground that the production of the petitioner unit was below 25% of Installed capacity.

    (vii) For issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ setting aside the orders or letters so brought on record by the Respondent Authorities by which the claim of the petitioner under the head of reimbursement of VAT/SGST paid has been denied for the period April 2021 to September 2021 and the ground that the production of the petitioner unit was below 25% of installed capacity.

    (viii) For issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner its entitlement under the head of reimbursement of SGST paid for the period April 2021 to September 2021 which has been denied on the ground that the petitioner has not done production of more than 25% during the said period.

    (ix) For issuing the writ of mandamus directing the respondents nor to with hold payment of reimbursement of SGST paid on the ground that the petitioner has not done production of more than 25%.

    (x) For any reliefs, direction/directions for which the petitioner is entitled may be given.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner pursuant to the Incentive Policy, 2011 floated by the Government of Bihar has set up a plastic furniture unit. That due permission was accorded to the unit of the petitioner by the State Investment Promotion Board (SIPB) in its meeting held on 21.07.2010 and, thereafter, letter dated 13.08.2010 (Annexure-P/2) was issued to the petitioner. That the unit of the petitioner started production on 08.11.2011, the petitioner was given the eligibility certificate for reimbursement of the VAT/SGST on 31.08.2012 (Annexure-P/3). That when the petitioner was denied the incentives i.e., reimbursement of VAT/SGST by the State Government, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of CWJC No. 10492 of 2021 (Annexure-P/4). This Court vide order dated 24.03.2022 has directed the authorities to consider the case of the petitioner for reimbursement of the VAT/SGST duly taking into consideration the orders passed by this Court in the case of M/s Sunny Stars Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. 2020 (2) PLJR 321. Thereafter, the petitioner was directed to file necessary documents and also certificate issued by the Chartered Accountant to show that the unit of the petitioner is in production. The petitioner accordingly submitted the required documents however, the authorities while granting the reimbursement for the period July 2017 to March 2021 have rejected the claim of the petitioner for the period April 2021 to September 2021. Learned counsel has stated that the rejection of the claim of the petitioner for the period April 2021 to September 2021 is ostensibly on the ground that the production of the unit of the petitioner was less than 25%. Learned counsel has stated that once the petitioner is found eligible for reimbursement of the VAT/SGST as per the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy 2011, the rejection of the claim for the months of April 2021 to September 2021 on the ground that the production in the unit of the petitioner is less than 25% is contrary to the policy. Learned counsel has stated that the subsequent amendments, if any, made will not be applicable to the petitioner as the petitioner has established the unit based on the promises given by the Government of Bihar under the Bihar Industrial Incentive Policy, 2011. Learned counsel has therefore, prayed this Hon’ble Court to allow the present writ petition and direct the respondents to reimburse the VAT/SGST for

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top