IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J., NAVNEET KUMAR, J.
Naveen Kumar Mahto @ Rakesh Kumar Mahto Son Of Mahendra Nath Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
ORDER :
2025 IA No.5408 of 2024
1. This instant interlocutory application has been filed for suspension of sentence against the Judgment of conviction dated 14.07.2023 and order of sentence dated 24.07.2023 passed by learned A.J.C.-IV-Cum- Special Judge-POCSO-cum-Children Court, Ranchi, in connection with Children Case No.02 of 2019 (Arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No.34 of 2018), whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Sections 376 (D) of the IPC and sentenced to undergo for R.I. for twenty years and fine of Rs.10,000/- for the offence under Section 376(D) of the IPC and in default of payment of fine he was further directed to undergo simple imprisonment for six months and period already undergone during investigation and trial directed to be set off.
2. It has been contended on behalf of the appellant that it is a case where no ingredient of Section 376(D) of IPC is being made out and this does not come under the definition of rape under Section 375 of IPC, since, the victim on her own wish had accompanied the appellant which would be evident from the narration as has been recorded by the victim itself in the Statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. It has been
Consent for companionship does not imply consent to sexual acts; coercion negates any claim of legitimate consent.
The victim's admission of consent complicates the prosecution's case under Section 376(2)(n) of the IPC, warranting suspension of the appellant's sentence during appeal.
Inconsistencies in witness testimony can create reasonable doubt, leading to suspension of sentence pending appeal.
The absence of conclusive proof of the victim's age and the consensual nature of the relationship justified the suspension of the sentence under the POCSO Act.
Presence at the crime scene can establish complicity under the POCSO Act, irrespective of whether physical acts are established.
Evidence of a prolonged relationship can influence the decision for suspending a sentence under IPC provisions, particularly where the victim's testimony supports the defense.
The court affirmed conviction based on corroborative evidence from FSL reports, despite contradictions in medical testimony, establishing that consistent witness accounts support the prosecution's na....
The court affirmed that compelling evidence, including witness testimony and DNA analysis, justified the conviction and denied the suspension of the sentence.
Victim's consistent testimony can uphold a conviction for penetrative sexual assault despite contradictions in prior statements and the absence of DNA evidence.
Accused’s conviction upheld due to corroborative victim testimony and DNA evidence, demonstrating the sufficiency of evidence in sexual offense cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.