IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JJ
Dutu Munda, son of Late Sham Munda – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
I.A. No. 1830 of 2025
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of appellant for suspension sentence dated 05.03.2024 respectively passed by the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-II, Seraikella in Kuchai P.S. Case No. 09 of 2018 corresponding to S.T. No.130 of 2021, whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been found guilty and convicted under Section 323, 376D/34 of Indian Penal Code and accordingly sentenced to undergo RI for 20 years with fine of Rs.20,000/- for the offence under section 376D of I.P.C. and in default of payment of fine has been directed to undergo SI for one year and also sentenced to undergo R.I. for 1 year for the offence under section 323 of IPC. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
2. It has been contended on behalf of the appellant that it is a case where the prosecution has miserably failed in substantiating the charges beyond all reasonable doubts reason being that from perusal of the testimony of P.W. 6 (victim), what she has deposed in her examination-in-chief with respect to the commission of crime of rape by the appellant has not been supported in her cross-examination. Learned counsel,
Inconsistencies in witness testimony can create reasonable doubt, leading to suspension of sentence pending appeal.
The court ruled that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for suspension of sentence, as the victim's testimony was corroborated by medical evidence.
The court upheld the conviction for gang rape based on credible victim testimony, ruling that contradictions and co-accused acquittals do not automatically justify sentence suspension.
The victim's admission of consent complicates the prosecution's case under Section 376(2)(n) of the IPC, warranting suspension of the appellant's sentence during appeal.
The victim's failure to report alleged rapes while living with a co-accused undermines her credibility, warranting suspension of the appellant's sentence pending appeal.
Presence at the crime scene can establish complicity under the POCSO Act, irrespective of whether physical acts are established.
The court affirmed that compelling evidence, including witness testimony and DNA analysis, justified the conviction and denied the suspension of the sentence.
The court emphasized that suspension of sentence post-conviction requires strong reasons, as the presumption of innocence is no longer applicable.
Consent for companionship does not imply consent to sexual acts; coercion negates any claim of legitimate consent.
The court affirmed conviction based on corroborative evidence from FSL reports, despite contradictions in medical testimony, establishing that consistent witness accounts support the prosecution's na....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.