Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Ankur Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Notice upon the respondent no.2 has not been effected.
2. From the records, it transpires that thrice notices have been issued upon the respondent no.2, however, the notice upon the respondent no.2 who happened to be the owner of the vehicle in question has not been effected.
3. In view of that, the learned counsel for the appellants will take steps for substituted service of notice upon the respondent no.2 by way of paper publication which is being published from the place where the respondent no.2 is residing.
4. For the purpose of draft etc. the learned counsel will approach Office within one week after summer vacation and thereafter within two weeks, the paper publication will be made and two weeks further thereafter supplementary affidavit annexing the paper publication will be filed by the learned counsel for the appellant.
5. Let these matters appear six weeks after summer vacation.
6. In M.A. No.338 of 2017 Mr. Bibhash Sinha, the learned counsel has appeared and Mr. Achinto Sen, has appeared on behalf of the claimants.
7. In Cross Objection No.37 of 2021 Mr. Achinto Sen the learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the objector and in view of that, M.A. No.338 of 2017,
The court emphasized the necessity of proper notice and timely compensation to claimants, allowing substituted service through publication when personal service fails.
Granting ad-interim stay subject to deposit of entire compensation and interest accrued.
The court emphasized the necessity of effective service of summons and adherence to procedural mandates in civil proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
