Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
I.A. No. 6374 of 2025
2. Mr. Manoj Tondon, Advocate, submits that I.A. No. 6374 of 2025 has been filed seeking intervention of Manoj Kumar Singh who is one of the nominees of the State of Jharkhand. He submits that the petitioner may be directed to implead the present intervener as party respondent in the present case.
3. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: -
“i. For issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash and cancel the letter dated 5.5.2025 (Annexure-8) issued by the Respondent No. 3 whereby and whereunder it has been decided that thee cannot be a nominee director of Govt. of Jharkhand on the Board of BISCOMAUN in the absence of equity share holding of the State of Jharkhand.
ii. For issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash and cancel the notification issued by the Respondent No. 2 contained in memo no. 3066 dated 3.4.2025 (Annexure-7) whereby it has been mentioned that the State of Bihar has 99.26% share holding in the BISCOMAUN and the Govt. of Jharkhand has no share capital in the BISCOMAUN and as such the Director nominated by the Govt. of Jharkhand is
The court affirmed that the State of Jharkhand retains rights to nominate a director in BISCOMAUN despite claims of zero equity by the State of Bihar, emphasizing the need for equitable representatio....
The court affirmed the right of a State to nominate members to the Board of a multi-State cooperative based on statutory provisions and the society's bye-laws, emphasizing procedural fairness and jur....
The appointment of a Special Officer or Administrator in a co-operative society does not make it a 'State' within the meaning of Article 12, but the officer becomes an 'authority' under Article 12 an....
Section 84 which falls under Chapter IX “Settlement of Disputes” of the Act, 2002 refers to reference of the disputes by the Central Registrar, Cooperative Societies with regard to the disputes touch....
Disputes related to the election of officers in a multi-State co-operative society should be referred to arbitration under section 84 of the Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002.
The acceptance of a nomination paper must adhere to statutory provisions, and disqualification under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act is self-operative, allowing for judicial intervention in....
A State Election Commission must address the maintainability of complaints regarding disqualifications as a preliminary issue before delving into merits, to ensure valid exercise of jurisdiction.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
