Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY PRASAD
Vinay Kumar Bind son of Sri Sudama Bind – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The present Criminal Revision No. 655 of 2016 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 18.08.2015 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2012 by Md. Nasiruddin, learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Palamauat Daltonganj whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Palamau at Daltonganj has dismissed the Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2012 and affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 21.01.2012 passed by Mr. Rajesh Sharan Singh, the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Rehala P. S. Case No. 45 of 2007 corresponding to G. R. No. 1193 of 2007 [T. R. No. 94 of 2012] by which the petitioner has been convicted for the offences under Sections 279 and 304 A of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of three (3) months for the offence under Section 279 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of one (1) year for the offence under Section 304 A of the Indian Penal Code
However, all the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
2. I. A. No. 2621 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail, during pe
Negligence under Indian Penal Code sections 279 and 304A requires evidence of recklessness leading to fatal consequences, with affirmed convictions supporting the effectiveness of judicial decisions.
The court condoned the delay in filing a Criminal Revision Application and granted bail to the petitioner, emphasizing the need for conditions to prevent further criminal conduct.
Provisional bail can be granted with conditions, especially in cases involving cheque dishonour under Section 138, while ensuring the interests of both parties are protected.
Public servants are held to higher standards of trust; misappropriation of funds invokes strict legal consequences under Section 409 IPC, emphasizing accountability and integrity.
The court emphasized the significance of custody duration in bail considerations, allowing the petitioner bail after eight months of incarceration.
The court granted bail during a pending criminal revision considering the petitioner's custody duration while imposing conditions to prevent future offenses.
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, emphasizing the necessity of compensation and the legal obligation of cheque issuance.
Provisional bail can be granted where the accused has been in custody for an extended period, especially in cases involving personal relationships and absence of the complainant, balancing personal l....
The court upheld certain convictions while granting bail based on the petitioner's lengthy custody and circumstances of the case.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
