SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 834

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Sajid Ansari @ Md. Sabir - Appellant 
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent 
A.B.A.No. 1436 of 2025
Decided on : 04-03-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anupam Anand, Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Arup Kumar Dey, A.P.P.

Anticipatory bail may be granted when allegations are vague, and similar relief has been provided to co-accused, provided that petitioners undertake cooperation with the investigation.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 147, 149, 323, 337, 338, 353, 504, 506 & 120B - Anticipatory bail - Petitioners charged with forming an unlawful assembly and alleged assault on another community - No specific allegations against petitioners; prior bail granted to co-accused - Grant of anticipatory bail deemed justified based on cooperation and security undertakings. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Legal principles - In the context of anticipatory bail, the court will consider false allegations and the principles of co-accused receiving similar relief. (Para 3)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case of unlawful assembly and violent conduct, claiming no specific wrongdoing attributed to them. Co-accused granted similar relief.

Findings of Court:
Given the circumstances and cooperative stance of the petitioners, they were entitled to anticipatory bail.

Issues: Whether the petitioners could receive anticipatory bail in light of allegations of unlawful assembly and the provision of security.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that given no specific allegations, prior similar orders for co-accused, and assurances from petitioners, anticipatory bail was warranted.

Result: Anticipatory bail granted under specified conditions.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek anticipatory bail. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court grants anticipatory bail. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard the parties.

2. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No. 07 of 2022, registered under Sections 147, 149, 323, 337, 338, 353, 504, 506 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were the members of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly pelted stones upon the member of the other community. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not indulge in any offence while on bail. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused persons have already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.10.2024, in A.B.A. No. 7009 of 2024. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be also given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

4. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

5. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Chatra, in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No.07 of 2022with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not indulge in any offence while on bail and subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top