Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J
Express Residency Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. No one turns up on behalf of the respondent No.8 in spite of repeated calls.
3. This Writ Petition (Civil) has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for quashing the letter No.1566 dated 20.08.2018 (Annexure-3) issued by the respondent No.5 to respondent No.2, 3 and 6 so far as it relates to directing them to restrain themselves from issuing the land receipts with respect to 34 kathas of land situated on Mauza- Ranchi, Thana No.205, Khata No.33, Plot No.591 until further orders.
4. The second prayer is for quashing the said letter No.1566 so far as it relates to the respondent No.5 directing the respondent No.4 to restrain itself from registering the sale and purchase of shops/plots in the building constructed on the said plot No.591 and to cancel the registration of sale- deed/lease-deed done in the past on the said land. Prayer has also been made for quashing the noting dated 27.08.2018 (Annexure-1) made by the respondent No.4 on the sale-deed executed by the petitioner in favour of the respondent No.7 whereby and wherein the respondent No.4 has rejected the application of the petitioner for re
The court held that legislative committees cannot issue binding directives beyond their authority, maintaining the supremacy of constitutional rights.
Point of law: A person being a special Commissioner is not competent to discharge the duties of Commissioner of Endowments. Undisputedly, the Commissioner is working and the post of Commissioner is n....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the refusal for registration of properties based on defective notifications under Section 22-A of the Registration Act was illegal, arbitrary,....
The government does not have the power to entertain a review application unless there is a provision for review under the statute.
Legislative privileges are integral, ensuring proceedings are upheld despite Assembly term expiration; judicial intervention is limited unless jurisdictional errors are clearly established.
The impugned circular and Rule 44(1)(i) were found to be contrary to sections 34 and 35 of the Registration act, 1908 and beyond the legislative competence of the respondents.
The impugned notices suffered from serious errors and were set aside. The Court emphasized the need for reasonableness and transparency in administrative actions and highlighted the potential bias of....
A purchaser under an unregistered sale deed does not acquire any right or interest in the immovable property.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
