SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Mad) 2460

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN, J.
The Secretary Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly - Appellant
Versus
P. Sivakumar @ Thayagam Kavi - Respondent 
W.A. Nos. 701, 709, 711, 712, 719, 721, 723, 725, 726, 729, 733, 734, 735, 739, 740, 742, 744, 745, 746, 747, 748, 749, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 758, 759, 760, 763, 764 & 766 of 2021, C.M.P. Nos. 3891, 3916, 3920, 3924, 3937, 3942, 3949, 3953, 3955, 3960, 3986, 3990, 3994, 4030, 4035, 4039, 4044, 4045, 4046, 4048, 4049, 4050, 4053, 4055, 4056, 4057, 4058, 4060, 4061, 4062, 4063, 4064, 4066, 4083, 4085, 4089 of 2021
Decided On : 31-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : P.S. Raman, A. Selvendran
For the Respondents: N.R. Elango, Manuraj, V. Ragavachari, I.S. Inbadurai, P.S. Siva Shanmugasundaram, P.S. Raman, A. Selvendran

Legislative privileges are integral, ensuring proceedings are upheld despite Assembly term expiration; judicial intervention is limited unless jurisdictional errors are clearly established.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Rules - Relevant provisions spotted regarding issuing of Show Cause Notices - Judicial review limitations discussed under Articles 212 and 194(3) of the Constitution concerning privileges of the Assembly and its members — It was held that the Show Cause Notices against members need to reach a logical conclusion and cannot lapse with the expiry of the Assembly term. (Paras 4, 30, 44, 62)

(B) Jurisdictional issues - Courts cannot interfere with proceedings or discretion of the Privilege Committee unless a clear illegality is established. The principle of non-interference by courts at the issuance stage of Show Cause Notices is reinforced unless a jurisdictional error is alleged. (Paras 26, 30, 32, 46)

(C) Nature of proceedings - Proceedings related to breach of privilege cannot be discontinued merely due to assembly dissolution; it continues into the new term for resolution within legislative rules. (Paras 53, 60, 62)

Facts of the case:
The appellants challenged the issuance of Show Cause Notices by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, arguing that they lapsed due to the Assembly's term expiration. The respondents countered that disciplinary proceedings regarding breach of privileges must conclude regardless of the Assembly's term. The Single Judge set aside the notices, leading to these appeals.

Findings of Court:
The High Court held that the Assembly has the absolute right to regulate its internal proceedings, thus upholding the validity of the Show Cause Notices which must be concluded in accordance with the Assembly's rules. The court reinstated the notices and directed that proper procedures be followed for final decisions on the matters.

Issues: The court addressed whether Show Cause Notices lapse upon Assembly term expiration and the scope of judicial review regarding legislative procedural irregularities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed that legislative privileges are non-negotiable, thus restricting judicial intervention at the preliminary phases of procedural misconduct inquiries. The need for finality in the notice procedures underpins democratic functioning within legislative frameworks.

Result: Appeals allowed, and writ petitions against the Show Cause Notices dismissed.

Table of Content
1. judicial review scope on legislative scns. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. contentions concerning scn lapsed. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. importance of maintaining dignity in legislative proceedings. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
4. jurisdiction limitations on scns issued. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)
5. final orders on the scn, must be concluded. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)

JUDGMENT :

S.M. Subramaniam, J.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

S.No.ContentsParagraph Nos.
IPRELUDE1 to 8
IICONTENTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PARTIES9 to 14
IIIDISCUSSIONS15 to 52
aPREMATURE CHALLENGE OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE15 to 35
bIMMUNITY TO THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY PROCEEDINGS OF PROCEDURAL IRREGULARITIES36 to 38
cMECHANISM TO REGULATE THE SMOOTH FUNCTIONING OF THE HOUSE39 to 42
dTHE POWERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY TO REGULATE ITS OWN PROCEDURE43 to 43
eMALICE AS A GROUND FOR QUASHING SHOW CAUSE NOTICE44 to 49
fPROVISIONS UNDER WHICH SHOW CAUSE NOTICE WAS ISSUED50 to 52
IVCONCLUSION53 to 63

(I) PRELUDE:

The Show Cause Notice, originally issued by the Secretary Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, to the then members of the opposition party, were previously under challenge and the Division Bench of this Court, through common order dated 25.08.2020, set aside the Show Cause Notice, granting liberty to the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly to issue fresh Notice in compliance with the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Rules.

2. Consequently, second Show Cause Notices (herein after referred as 'SCN') were issued to the respondents in the present writ appeals on 07.09.2020, on the issue of breach of privileges calling upon them to submit their respective explanations. The second 'SCN' issued to the respondents herein were under challenge before the Writ Court. The Writ Court allowed the writ petitions by setting aside the 'SCN' issued to the respondents, which resulted in institution of present intra-court appeals by the Secretary, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly.

3. The learned Advocate General, Mr.P.S.Raman contended that the 'SCN' became lapsed on account of expiry of the term of the Assembly in the year 2021. Therefore, the 'SCN' need not be proceeded with. This Court intervened on the ground that the 'SCN' had been issued by the Privilege Committee and admittedly the proceedings have not reached finality.

4. The question arises, whether the High Court, in exercise of the powers of judicial review, can set aside the 'SCN' issued by the Legislative Assembly on the issues relating to breach of Privileges of the House? The learned Advocate General, with all fairness, would submit that un-concluded proceedings of this nature cannot be set aside by the High Courts. It is the 'SCN' issued calling upon explanations from the members on the issues relating to breach of privileges and it must be concluded in all respects.

5. The power of judicial review of the High Court, its scope, is the issue to be deliberated by this Court. The relevance and importance of concluding the issues relating to breach of privileges of the House, under the Constitutional perspective, is to be considered by this Court. Undoubtedly, setting aside the 'SCN' issued by the Privilege Committee of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly would set a bad precedent and result in opening of an avenue to many similarly placed persons to challenge 'SCN' relating to breach of privileges of the House by way of writ petition before the High Courts. In the context of the above views expressed by this Court, the learned Advocate General would submit that this Court may remand the matter back to the Legislative Assembly for consideration and to take an appropriate decision. Therefore, this Court has to necessarily adjudicate certain important issues involved in the impugned 'SCN' and the impugned writ order. The legality of the impugned writ order is to be considered

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top