IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI, JJ.
Rajan Oraon, S/o. Udesh Oraon - Appellant
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 565 of 2020 With I.A. No. 11378 of 2024
Decided On : 29-04-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case details highlight allegations of a heinous crime involving the appellant. (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of the alleged crime. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arguments presented by the appellant and the prosecution. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court's observations on juvenility and relevant legal provisions. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 5. court's decision to reject the interlocutory application. (Para 58 , 59) |
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
I.A. No. 11378 of 2024:
1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed under Section 9 (2) and9(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act, 2015 before this Court to declare the appellant as juvenile/child at the time of alleged occurrence.
Factual Matrix:
2. The prosecution case is based on the written report (Ext.3) addressed to the Officer-in-charge of Kanke Police Station; Ranchi submitted by the 'victim' (name withheld) on 27.11.2019. Therein she stated that on 26.11.2019 between 5.30 to 5.45 P.M, she along with her friend Mohan Singh Bodra (P.W.17) took the ring road from BIT Mesra to NUSRL Hostel where she was to get dropped. On the way they stopped near Sangrampur Bus stand to attend nature’s call and stayed back there for some time under the shade of bus stop. In the meantime, a car in which 6 to 7 people were crammed stopped before them. They were all inebriated.
3. Furthermore, two persons on a Pulsar bike came to a halt before them. The occupants of the vehicles inquired the 'victim' and her friend as to why they were present at the bus stop. They responded that they had to go to NUSRL hostel. Upon this, few persons got down from the car and started hurling insults at the 'victim' and her friend and beating them. The accused persons addressed the two friends and stated, "You have taken up committing wrong and indulging in indecent behaviour on a regular basis and that is the reason you are sitting here." Thereafter, they started beating them again during the course of which, her spectacles fell off.
4. She further stated that they asked her to make a call to her mother. Her friend Mohan who was at that time in possession of her phone, handed it to her. She then made a call to her mother and as soon as her mother answered, one of the accused snatched her phone and held on to it. She further alleged that they attempted to persuade the accused that they were on their way to her hostel. This only seemed to make them stubborn and brash. They asked her whether they could drop her to the hostel and without waiting for a reply, they manhandled her into straddling the bike, registration number: JH-01-DQ-8951. The 'victim' and her friend screamed.
5. She further stated that two of the accused, whom she could identify by face, started threatening her that if she dared scream, she would be shot dead. The bike was driven by one person whereas another, seated behind her was holding her in place, gagging her mouth. They rode towards the road passing under the overbridge. She further submitted that the said bike halted after going some distance, perhaps because there wasn’t enough petrol. In the meantime, the rest of their party in the car joined them, two of them forcibly pushed her into the car. While one was driving towards the overbridge, another was holding her, gagging her mouth. After covering a certain distance, the car turned to the right and started going towards what looked like a secluded place.
6. After some time, the car stopped near a brick kiln where there was no one whom she could ask for help. Meanwhile the cellphone belonging to the driver began to ring, she tried to snatch the phone but failed. The said person got down from the car, locked it and called other persons asking them to come where they had parked.
7. She further alleged that she wa
Timely claims of juvenility under the Juvenile Justice Act must be substantiated with evidence during trial; late submissions impede mental capacity assessments.
The court affirmed that juvenility must be claimed at trial; failure to do so precludes later claims, especially for heinous offences.
(1) Bail petition – There exists difference between a child below 16 years and those who are accused of or found guilty for a heinous offence and above 16 years – Section 12 of J.J. Act will have no ....
An individual assessed to be a juvenile at the time of offence must not be tried as an adult, with their age determination being essential for proper legal proceedings.
(1) Plea of juvenility can be raised before any Court and it shall be recognized at any stage, even after final disposal of case.(2) Rape and disappearance of evidence – Merits of conviction could be....
(1) Claim of juvenility may be raised before any Court which shall be recognised at any stage even after final disposal of case.(2) Decision against determination of juvenility ought not to be taken ....
The plea of juvenility can be raised at any stage, including appeal, and must be considered under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, allowing for modification of sentence based on age.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.