Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Chandra Shekhar Dubey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 18.07.2024 (Annexure-12), passed by the Labour Court, Bokaro in Trade Union Appeal No. 1/2023, whereby the preliminary objection raised by the petitioner was not considered and the same was rejected on the ground that the issue involves a decision of both question of fact and question of law, as such, the same shall be considered at the time of final hearing of the appeal.
3. The brief facts of the case are that Bokaro Steel Workers Union was registered by the Registrar, Trade Union of undivided Bihar; however, the Registrar, Trade Union, Bihar in the year 2017, cancelled the registration of 980 trade unions which were active in the State of Jharkhand after reorganisation and creation of the State of Jharkhand. Subsequently, the Labour Department of the State of Jharkhand published an invitation for getting those cancelled Trade Unions registered with State of Jharkhand.
4. In response to that the Petitioner filed an application along with relevant details of registration. Simultaneously, the 6th Respondent also filed a separate application for re-registration before th
Mixed questions of law and fact in labor disputes should be resolved during final hearings, not as preliminary issues.
Point of law: If the Registrar is satisfied that the certificate is obtained by fraud or mistake or the Union has ceased to exist, is not the circumstance here and further has willfully and after not....
An appeal under Section 11 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 is maintainable only against refusal of registration or cancellation of registration, not against a refusal to cancel.
Termination from service - Misconduct – As per provisions of ID Act at a time when Union had continued to enjoy its corporate body status cannot be said to be in any manner vitiated merely because Un....
The court ruled that disputes regarding the signing of Form-J by trade union officers are factual and not suitable for resolution under Article 226, directing such matters to Civil Court.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to decide all issues together in labour matters to prevent undue delay in the adjudication of the real dispute.
A trade union must exist at the time of application for recognition to raise objections; membership must be proven for the preceding six months.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
