Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Surya Nandan Pandey S/o Late Ramadhar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims regularization of housing based on prior instructions and resolutions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents argue the petitioner failed to comply with terms for regularization. (Para 4) |
| 3. court orders reconsideration of case due to errors in the prior decision-making process. (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
1. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for following reliefs:-
a. Issuance of appropriate writ/writ(s), order/orders, direction/directions particularly in a nature of certiorari for quashing the office order dated 22.02.2023 (Annexure-13 to writ petition) passed by respondent no. 2, as the same is arbitrary, illegal and based upon unfounded facts and ignoring Resolution No. 1817 dated 17.03.2017 issued by the Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Jharkhand read with minutes of meeting dated 13.07.2018 held under the Chairmanship of Chief Minister, Jharkhand as issued vide memo no. 2018 dated 05.09.2018.
b. Upon quashing of the same, for issuance of appropriate writ/ writs, order/orders, direction/directions particularly in a nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents particularly
An eviction order based on procedural lapses must consider submissions made within the stipulated timelines as valid; due process and opportunity for hearing are paramount in administrative decisions....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners have no right to continue with the possession of the said house based on the provisions of the notification and the principles....
The obligation of the State and its instrumentalities to act fairly and transparently in the allotment of state largesse, in accordance with the principles of fairness and good governance, and in con....
[The court established that notices issued without proper authority under the Jharkhand State Housing Board Act, 2000, are invalid, and that allottees have a right to equitable treatment in the conte....
Second writ petitions are not maintainable if the previous petition was withdrawn without permission, and former members of the legislature have no vested right to retain government accommodations af....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
