Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
AMBUJ NATH
Dharmendra Kumar Gond, Son of Harigovind Gond – Appellant
Versus
The Central Coalfields Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ambuj Nath, J.
Petitioners have filed this writ application for issuance of an appropriate writ (s)/direction (s) in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent authorities to allow them to participate in the further selection process as prescribed in Advertisement dated 28.03.2023. Petitioners have further prayed for a direction upon the Respondent authorities to determine their eligibility on all aspects, considering the Note-B of the Advertisement dated 28.03.2023, wherein the petitioners claim to possess the necessary qualification that meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the advertisement. They have finally prayed for issuance of a direction upon the Respondent authorities to release the final selection list based on the previously published provisional merit list and to issue appointment letter in their favour.
2. Case of the petitioners is that vide Employment Notice Ref. No. CCL/Recruitment Adv-Stat/032023/63 was published by the Respondent Central Coalfields Limited (CCL) on 28.03.2023, application was invited for filling up the vacancies of various posts including the post of Assistant Foreman (Electrical). The Advertisement/Employment Notice was publish
Candidates participating in the selection process are estopped from challenging the eligibility criteria once they accept the terms in the employment notice.
Eligibility for employment cannot be retroactively altered post-selection without statutory basis, safeguarding candidates' rights under Articles 14 and 16.
Point of Law : Appointment has to be made strictly as per terms of the advertisement and in case, the candidates who did not possess the qualification as mentioned in the advertisement were permitted....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the selection process must adhere to the terms of the advertisement and the prescribed rules, and any deviation from these norms is impermissi....
The court affirmed the validity of restricting recruitment eligibility to candidates holding unrestricted mining competency certificates as per regulatory requirements, ruling that such stipulations ....
The court upheld that employers could set qualification requirements for recruitment, confirming that restricting eligibility to holders of unrestricted competency certificates was lawful under the s....
Selection decisions must be justified and not arbitrary, ensuring fairness in administrative processes.
Appointment in public service – Recognized qualification is an essential facet of Article 16 of Constitution of India – No rights can be recognized in a candidate aspiring to enter public service on ....
The court upheld that recruitment processes allow higher qualified candidates unless explicitly prohibited, and it affirmed that employers have discretion in determining eligibility criteria without ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
