Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
K.K. Builders Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeking extension for sand mining. (Para 1) |
| 2. facts of the case recounted. (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments regarding delays. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. court observes jurisdiction for issuing mandamus. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. purpose of writ of mandamus discussed. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. establishing rights for mandamus issuance. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. conditions for mandamus discussed. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 8. legal principles of mandamus in india. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 9. factual bases for writ petition evaluated. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 10. counterarguments from respondents regarding delays. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 11. lease deed established conditions. (Para 19) |
| 12. terms of contract binding the parties. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 13. acceptance of terms & enforcement of contracts. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 14. court's jurisdiction in altering contracts. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 15. existing lease validated, but expired. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 16. awareness of protocol before excavation. (Para 28) |
| 17. mandamus application considered as lack of statutory duty. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 18. potential for damages as legal recourse. (Para 31) |
| 19. writ petition dismissed. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constituti
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
