Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Hi-Tech Heritage Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties to the suit and properties in dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments against maintainability and right to sue (Para 8 , 12 , 15 , 20) |
| 3. court’s assessment on the maintainability of the suit (Para 11 , 21 , 71 , 102) |
| 4. determination of rights arising from the transactions (Para 19 , 28 , 39 , 48 , 115) |
| 5. final order dismissing the appeal (Para 146 , 148) |
JUDGMENT :
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
1. This first appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.11.2022 (Decree sealed and signed on 14.12.2022) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sub- Divisional Court, Chandil in Original Suit No.46 of 2012 (Title Suit No.46 of 2012) whereby and whereunder the suit has been decreed on contest in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents and Sale Deed No.1421 dated 03.03.2011 executed by the Defendant No.2 in favour of Defendant No.1 has been declared as null and void and further, it has been held that Defendant No.1 has not acquired any interest over the suit land. Consequently, the defendants are the appellants before this Court.
2. The plaintiffs/respondents had filed Title Suit No.46 of 2012 for the following reliefs:
(i) That it be dec
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
