IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Sangeet Kumar Dubey, son of Late Ramesh Kumar Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Kriti Tiwari alias kriti kumari, wife of Sangeet Kumar – Respondent
Prayer:
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant appeal has been filed challenging the legality and propriety of impugned judgment passed on 22.10.2024 and decree signed on 13.11.2024 by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Deoghar whereby and whereunder the Original Suit No. 16 of 2023 filed by the petitioner-appellant-husband under Section 13(1), (i-a) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 for a decree of divorce has been dismissed.
Factual Matrix
2. The brief facts of the case of the appellant-husband as narrated, is that the respondent happens to be legally married wife of the petitioner-appellant and their marriage was solemnized on 08th March 2019 at Deoghar according to the Hindu rites and ceremonies. After marriage, the respondent informed the petitioner-appellant that she is not happy with him and she did not want to get marry with him. The behaviour and conduct of respondent were abnormal and she denied the petitioner-appellant from matrimonial pleasure and enjoyment of sex and she got her bed separated to ensure that there will be no physical contact between the two. The respondent maintained a very indifferent attitude towards the petitioner-appellant and his family members and
Dr. N.G. Dastane Vs. Mrs. S. Dastane
Shobha Rani Vs. Madhukar Reddi
V. Bhagat vs. D. Bhagat (Mrs.)
Vijay Kumar Ramchandra Bhate v. Neela Vijay Kumar Bhate
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.