Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Sanjeev Kumar Lal, S/o Late Braj Kishore Lal – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
Prayer:
1. The instant application has been filed under Sections 4 83 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying for grant of bail in connection with ECIR Case No. 2 of 2023 arising out of ECIR/RNSZO/16/2020 dated 17.09.2020 for the offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [hereinafter referred to as PML Act, 2002] punishable under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, based on FIR bearing No. 13/2019 registered by ACB, Jamshedpur under Section 7 (a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (amended as on 2018) [hereinafter referred to as P.C. Act, 2018] and F.I.R No.22/2023 registered by Economic Offence Wing, Delhi pending in the court of learned Special Judge CBI-cum- PML Act, Ranchi.
Factual Matrix of the Case
2. An ECIR bearing No. ECIR/RNSZO/16/2020 was recorded on 17.09.2020 based on the FIR bearing No. 13/2019 dated 13.11.2019, registered by ACB Jamshedpur, under section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, (amended as on 2018). Subsequently, Charge-sheet dated 11.01.2020 was submitted by ACB against Alok Ranjan and Suresh Prasad Verma under Section 7 (b) of P.C. Act, 20
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
