Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Braj Shankar Prasad Sinha, son of Late Chaturbhuj Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing the resolution issued vide memo No. 413/Ranchi dated 15.01.2014 by the Deputy Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, issued pursuant to the order of Hon'ble Governor, Jharkhand, whereby and whereunder, the petitioner has been compulsorily retired and 30% amount has also been deducted from his pension under Section 49 (IV-a) of Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules.
The petitioner has further prayed for quashing the appellate order dated 27.10.2014, issued under the signature of Deputy Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, whereby and whereunder, the appeal filed by the petitioner against the punishment order dated 15.01.2014 has been rejected.
3. The brief facts as per the pleadings are that the petitioner was primarily inducted in service of Bihar Government as Stenographer Class-1 in Patna Secretariat on 10.04.1973. Thereafter, the petitioner was selected for administrative servi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
