Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Prakash Munjal – Appellant
Versus
Lal Yashwardhan Nath Shahdeo @ Lal Karan Nath Shahdeo, S/o Late Dilip Nath Shahdeo – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. All these batch of Civil Miscellaneous Petitions arise out of Original Suit Nos. 253/19, 260/19, 262/19, 263/19 and 264/19. In all these suits, common plaintiff is Lal Yashwardhan Nath Shahdeo @ Lal Karan Nath Shahdeo, Son of Late Dilip Nath Shahdeo minor through his next friend Sumit Singh Moyal for declaration of right, title, interest and possession over the suit property and for declaring that sale deeds dated 14.09.2000 executed by defendant no. 3 in favour of defendant no. 4 was void ab initio and did not confer any right, title and interest to defendant no. 4.
2. In all the above suits there was no co-plaintiff with Lal Yashwardhan Nath Shahdeo @ Lal Karan Nath Shahdeo. Whereas, in Original Suit Nos. 253/19 the co-plaintiff of Lal Yashwardhan Nath Shahdeo @ Lal Karan Nath Shahdeo, is Smt. Rupa Shahdeo wife of Late Sri Dilip Nath Shahdeo.
3. All the Suits are with respect to Schedule-1 of the plaint measuring 31 acres and 52 decimals, appertaining to Plot Nos. 18, 19, 43, 44, and 45 of Khata No. 176 at Mouza Hehal, District Ranchi except in Original Suit No. 253 of 2019 which pertains to an area of 6 Katha 11 Chhatak in Plot No. 44/part K
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
