IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Suresh Prasad son of Late Jodhi Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Suraj Kumar Bhadani, son of Late Jugal Kishore Bhadani – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.
1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 30.01.2023 (decree signed on 04.02.2023) passed by learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division,) III, Jamshedpur in Original Suit No. 112 of 2007 registered as T.P.E.S 112 of 2007 whereby the suit seeking specific performance of agreement dated 01.06.2007 has been dismissed.
2. The suit was filed for a decree of specific performance of contract arising out of the agreement dated 01.06.2007 directing the defendant to execute and register a regular sale deed transferring the suit property described in the schedule-A in favour of the plaintiff on receipt of balance consideration amount of Rs. 30,25,000/- and for delivery of possession.
3. Case of the plaintiff:-
(a) The suit property was originally allotted by M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Limited in the name of Dina Nath Chakravorty who died on 05.02.1982 and his wife Raj Laxmi Devi died on 20.12.1975, leaving behind the following legal heirs and successors:-
(a) Jatindra Nath Chakravorty (died on 21.03.2001)
(b) Rabindra Nath Chakravorty
(c) Birendra Nath Chakravorty
(d) Sachindra Nath Chakravorty (died on 30.01.2001)
(e) Ranendra Nath Chakravorty
(f) Ahindra
Shyam Kumar Inani versus Vinod Agrawal and Others
Gurmit Singh Bhatia versus Kiran Kant Robinson and Others
Kasturi Vs. Iyyamperumal and others
Maharaj Singh and Others versus Karan Singh (dead) through legal Representatives
Kishan Singh (dead) through LRS. Versus (Gurpal Singh and Others
N.P. Thirugnanam (dead) by LRS. Versus Dr. R. Jagan Mohan Rao and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.