Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
Manoj Kumar Babulal Punamiya, son of Sri Babulal Punamiya – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand through Director of Enforcement – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J
1. Since these matters are interlinked and, as such, both are heard together and being disposed of by a common order.
2. Both of these criminal revision petitions have been filed under Section397 and 401 of Cr.P.C.
3. Criminal Revision No. 1091 of 2012 is directed against the order dated 25.09.2012 passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI cum PMLA, Ranchi in in connection with ECIR/02/PAT/09/AD registered for the offence under section 3 and punishable under section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short PMLA, 2002) whereby and whereunder, the application filed by the petitioner seeking discharge has been rejected.
4. Criminal Revision No.1326 of 2018 is directed against the order dated 13.06.2018 in connection with ECIR/02/PAT/09/AD registered for the offence under section 4 of the PMLA, 2002 whereby and whereunder, the charge has been framed against the petitioners with respect to Supplementary Complaint.
Factual Matrix:
5. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the instant petition which requires to be enumerated herein, read as under:
(i) The Petitioner filed the Cr. Rev. 1091 of 2012 challenging the Order dated 25
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
