Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Jitendra Kumar Pradhan S/o Jagabandu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual details of the incident involved. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding requirement of sanction. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's reasoning on legality of actions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. criminal proceedings quashed due to lack of sanction. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final orders and disposal of the petition. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 with a prayer to quash and set aside the entire criminal proceedings including the order dated 06.06.2023 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khunti in connection with Murhu P.S. Case No.24 of 2020 corresponding to G.R. Case No.124 of 2023 whereby and where under the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khunti has taken cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and Section 27 of the ARMS ACT against the petitioner.
3. The undisputed fact is that the petitioner is a personnel of Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and on the alleged date of occurrence, he was a general duty constable of the Central
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
