Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Suresh Kumar Agarwal, S/o Late Ratan Lal Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Kumar Agarwal, S/o Late Ratan Lal Gupta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal under indian succession act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. argument for condoning delay in appeal (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. facts of succession application case (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. arguments for joint succession certificate (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's reasoning on joint succession certificate (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. entitlement for joint succession certificate (Para 15) |
| 7. modification of succession certificate (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER :
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. The appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 384 of the Indian SUCCESSION ACT , 1925 against the judgment dated 03.10.2024 passed by learned Commercial Court, Dhanbad in Succession Case No. 22 of 2022, whereby and whereunder, the succession certificate has been directed to be issued in favour of respondent No.1.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant in this interlocutory application (I.A. No. 6555 of 2025) which has been filed under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT for condonation of delay of 124 days in preferring the instant misc. appeal.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that against judgment and order, initially the appellant had preferred Succession (Revocation) Case No.42 of 2024 whic
The law permits the issuance of joint succession certificates when multiple applicants are equally entitled, contrary to the trial court's findings.
Succession Certificate – Courts are required to deal with application under Section 372 of Succession Act in a summary manner without asking for strict proof as contemplated under Indian Evidence Act....
The court clarified that proceedings under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act are summary and do not grant final adjudication of rights, allowing for provisional determinations to meet urgent n....
judgment and decree passed by the learned First Appellate Court having come to the conclusion that the proceedings for obtaining Succession Certificate was defective and the Certificate was obtained ....
A succession certificate obtained by fraudulent concealment of heirs' relationships is revocable under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act.
Nominees are custodians, not owners; succession certificates are granted based on summary assessments without requiring complex pleadings or trials.
The imposition of a security bond for a Succession Certificate is discretionary and not mandatory, particularly when there are no other claimants.
Entitlement to family pension and succession benefits granted to the second wife, affirming her legal status as a widow under applicable pension rules, despite the opposition from children of the fir....
Section 373 merely lays down that Court is required to be satisfied that there is ground for entertaining application namely by a person who desires to make a claim.
The Court cannot direct the deposit of charges for succession certificate for the entire claim/security when the petitioner is claiming only a portion of the security.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
