Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANANDA SEN
Seraj Ansari son of Ali Hasan Ansari, Exconstable – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to disciplinary removal based on documents. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural compliance and document authenticity. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on review limits and inquiry findings. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. conclusion affirming validity of disciplinary proceedings. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
ANANDA SEN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner in this writ petition has challenged the orders dated 24.06.2017, 04.10.2017 and 05.06.2018 i.e. the removal order, appellate order and the revisional order respectively, passed in a disciplinary proceeding.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner was proceeded against in terms of Rule 36 of the Central Industrial Security Force Rules but Rule 36(3) has not been followed in this case thus the entire departmental proceeding is vitiated. He further submits that the respondents have wrongly arrived at a conclusion that the documents which have been presented by the petitioner at the time of entry in service is fake. There is no conclusive proof to arrive at the conclusion that the documents are f
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
