IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Sanjay Kumar S/o Kusheshwar Prasad Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Annu Devi W/o Sanjay Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. The instant appeal under section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is directed against the judgment dated 28.03.2023 and the decree dated 05.04.2023 passed in Original Suit No.275 of 2017 by the learned Addl. Principal Judge, Addl. Family Court-2, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur (in short, Family Judge) whereby and whereunder the petition filed under section 13(1) (i-a) and 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 by the appellant-husband against the respondent-wife has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case as pleaded in the plaint having been recorded by the learned Family Judge, needs to be referred herein as:
(i) The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 18.04.2008 according to Hindu Rites and Custom. After the marriage the appellant-husband came to know that the respondent is mental patient of Schizophrenia for which her treatment was going on in Tata Motor Hospital and Ranchi Mental Hospital and the respondent is suffering from Schizophrenia.
(ii) It is a disease of mental disorder characterized by abnormal social behaviour and failure to understand what is real. Common symptoms of this disease are confused thinking, hearin
Arulvelu and Anr. vs. State [Represented by the Public Prosecutor] and Anr.
Dr. N.G. Dastane vs. S. Dastana
Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate v. Neela Vijay Kumar Bhate
Joydeep Majumdar v. Bharti Jaiswal Majumdar
Vidhya Viswanathan v. Kartik Balakrishnan
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.