SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 2183

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH KUMAR, J.
Mani Lal Bhagat, S/o Maheshwar Bhagat - Appellants
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Respondent
Cr. Appeal (S.J) No.1029 of 2004
Decided On : 13-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. A. K. Trivedi, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P

Members of an unlawful assembly are collectively responsible for injuries caused during its action, reinforcing the conviction based on consistent eyewitness testimony and corroborated medical evidence.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 148, 323/149, 325/149, 307/149 - Conviction for unlawful assembly and causing grievous injuries - The appellants were convicted for several offences stemming from a land dispute where they assaulted the informant and his family members. The court emphasized that members of an unlawful assembly are responsible for injuries inflicted upon victims during its formation. (Paras 3, 21, and 22)

(B) Conviction - Evidence - The conviction relied heavily on the consistent testimony of four injured witnesses and corroborating medical evidence, thus overruling arguments made on insufficient evidence regarding specific injuries and the absence of independent witnesses. (Paras 16, 20)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were accused of assaulting the informant and his family while they were working on their land, leading to injuries inflicted with weapons during an altercation over land. (Para 4, 5)

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the conviction based on the formation of an unlawful assembly and the nature of the injuries, affirming that no mitigating circumstances justified altering the sentence. (Paras 19, 22)

Issues: Main issues included the sufficiency of evidence regarding specific assaults by the appellants and the implications of a land dispute in the context of conviction. (Paras 16, 18)

Ratio Decidendi: The court maintained that since the injured witnesses clearly identified the appellants as participants in the unlawful assembly, and injuries were corroborated by medical evidence, their conviction stands validated despite claims of inadequate witness testimony. (Paras 20, 21)

Result: Appeal dismissed; the appellants' conviction was affirmed and their bail was cancelled, directing them to serve the sentence imposed by the trial court. (Paras 23, 24)

Table of Content
1. appeal follows death of two appellants. (Para 1 , 2)
2. conviction for serious offenses detailed. (Para 3)
3. f.i.r details and initial events leading to trial. (Para 4 , 5)
4. testimony of witnesses regarding the incident. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. additional evidence presented, primarily land disputes. (Para 13 , 14)
6. trial court’s conviction affirmed. (Para 15)
7. defense arguments regarding conviction. (Para 16 , 17)
8. court’s analysis of evidence and legality of assembly. (Para 18 , 19)
9. conviction under ipc affirmed; evidence sufficiency. (Para 20 , 21)
10. final decision and directives to trial court. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH KUMAR, J.

1. Although the present appeal has been preferred by seven appellants, but out of which, two appellants have died, during the pendency of the present appeal. Vide order dated 22.11.2021, the present criminal appeal stands abated so far as appellants namely, Mahendra Bhagat and Rajesh Bhagat are concerned.

Thus, the present appeal survives only with respect to five appellants, namely, Mani Lal Bhagat, Gopal Bhagat, Manoj Bhagat, Rama Bhagat and Prem Bhagat.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.P.P

3. The present appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction dated 04.06.2004 and order of sentence dated 16.06.2004, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C), Latehar, in Sessions Case No.404 of 2000, arising out of Latehar P.S. Case No.70 of 1998 (G.R. No.211 of 1998), whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offence under Sections 148 , 323/149, 325/149 and 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) and have been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years under Section 148 I.P.C, rigorous imprisonment for one year under Sections 323 / 149 I.P.C, rigorous imprisonment for four years under Sections 325 / 149 I.P.C and rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine of Rs.2000/- (Two thousand) each with default clause under Sections 307 / 149 I.P.C. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

4. The criminal law has been put into motion by lodging an F.I.R being Latehar P.S. Case No.70 of 1998 against the appellants under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 323 & 324 I.PC. The F.I.R has been lodged on the fardbeyan of informant namely, Ajay Mochi (P.W.-5). Vide order dated 10.08.1998, Sections 307 , 325 & 326 IPC were added.

The brief facts of the case, as has been disclosed in the written report dated 06.07.1998 by the informant, Ajay Mochi, is that while he was ploughing his land along with his brother Pramod Mochi, then all the accused persons/appellants came there and restrained them from sowing seeds in the lands on which the informant objected and told them that the land belongs to them. Then the accused Maheshwar Bhagat abused them and ordered to assault. Then all the appellants started assaulting them with lathi, axe and spear and on commotion when informant's wife and mother came there, they were also assaulted. The said occurrence was seen by several co-villagers.

5. On the basis of the said fardbeyan, the police, instituted the F.I.R and after investigation, has submitted charge-sheet on 30.09.1998 against seven accused persons namely, Rama Bhagat, Mani Lal Bhagat, Gopal Bhagat, Manoj Bhagat, Prem Bhagat, Rajesh Bhagat and Mahendra Bhagat for the offence under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326 & 307 IPC . Upon which cognizance has been taken and charges has been framed under , 148, 307/ 149 I.P.C and the case has been committed to the court of Sessions to which the appellants have pleaded innocence and claimed to be tried.

6. For substantiating the prosecution story, altogether seven witnesses have been examined on behalf of the prosecution.

7. P.W.-1, Pramod Mochi, is brother of the informant and an injured witness. He has stated in examination-in-chief that on the date of occurrence when he was ploughing and sowing seeds in his field along with the informant, the accused

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top