Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANANDA SEN
Chandeshwar Singh, S/o Late Kesho Singh – Appellant
Versus
Coal India Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's requested reliefs outlined. (Para 1) |
| 2. background on petitioner's employment and charges. (Para 2) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against the penalty. (Para 3) |
| 4. respondents' defense regarding inquiry process. (Para 4) |
| 5. charges against petitioner detailed. (Para 5) |
| 6. clarification of charges against the petitioner. (Para 6) |
| 7. enquiry officer's exoneration of the petitioner. (Para 7) |
| 8. disciplinary authority's differing conclusion. (Para 8) |
| 9. limited scope of court's review in disciplinary matters. (Para 9) |
| 10. requirement for principles of natural justice. (Para 10) |
| 11. authority's duty to provide opportunities for defense. (Para 11) |
| 12. court's lack of jurisdiction to reappraise misconduct findings. (Para 12) |
| 13. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 13) |
| 14. end of pending applications. (Para 14) |
ORDER :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:-
a) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s), specifically a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 19.01.2021 as contained in Memo No. CCL/VIG/RDA-08/19/20-21/1841, issued by the respondent no.4 whe
The High Court confirmed that the Disciplinary Authority's decision to impose a penalty is sustainable if procedures are adhered to and the findings are not perverse, maintaining limited judicial rev....
Disciplinary Authority must provide reasons for differing from the Enquiry Officer's findings in a second show cause notice to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice.
The standard of proof in disciplinary proceedings is based on preponderance of probabilities, and courts will not interfere unless the punishment is shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of considering the defence of the delinquent employee and recording reasons in decision-making processes, highlighting the obligation to adhere to principles of....
The principles of natural justice require that a disciplinary authority must provide reasons for differing from an inquiry officer's findings and allow the employee an opportunity to respond before i....
The disciplinary authority must record its own findings and provide an opportunity for the delinquent employee to respond if it disagrees with the findings of the inquiry officer. The delay in initia....
The High Court does not act as an appellate authority in disciplinary matters and will not interfere with the quantum of punishment unless it is shocking to the conscience.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
