SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 2204

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, ARUN KUMAR RAI, JJ.
Arjun Rawani – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 268 of 1995 (P)
Decided On :12-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. B.M. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate

The court affirmed that the appellants' actions constituted unprovoked assault resulting in death, negating their claim of private defense, supported by consistent eyewitness accounts.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 307, and 323 - Conviction and sentence - Appellants convicted for committing murder and grievous injuries in a land dispute - Evidence presented by several eyewitnesses demonstrated involvement of the accused - The prosecution established beyond reasonable doubt that the assault was unprovoked and led to death. (Paras 1-25)

(B) Right of Private Defence - The court held that the evidence did not support a claim of exercise of private defense, as the appellants exceeded their rights in responding to the alleged aggression. (Para 23)

Facts of the case:
The appeal arises from a conviction relating to a land dispute, where a mob allegedly attacked the informant’s party while they were working in the field, leading to the death of Khiro Rawani and injuries to others. The attack was blamed on the appellants and others, armed and instigated to assault.

Findings of Court:
The trial court found the appellants guilty of murder and attempted murder based on consistent eyewitness testimony and autopsy reports corroborating the cause of death.

Issues: The supreme issue was whether the appellants acted in self-defense and the credibility of eyewitness accounts concerning the circumstances of the attack and defense claims.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that there was no valid evidence of aggression from the informant's party; the overwhelming evidence showed that the assault initiated by the appellants was intentional and vicious, negating any claims of self-defense.

Result: Appeal dismissed; the conviction upheld.

JUDGMENT :

Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.

1. Heard Mr. B.M. Tripathi, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned P.P. for the State assisted by Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, learned counsel appearing for the informant.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 23.08.1995 (sentence passed on 25.08.1995) passed by Shri Shyama Prasad Singh, learned Sessions Judge, Deoghar in Sessions Case No. 69 of 1994, whereby and whereunder, the appellants Pabrit Rawani, Sukhdeo Rawani and Rawan Rawani have been convicted for the charge u/s 302 of the IPC and have been sentenced to R.I. for life, appellants Pabrit Rawani, Gogal Rawani, Rawan Rawani and Bishwanath Rawani have been convicted for the charge u/s 307 of the and have been sentenced to R.I. for 10 years, the appellants Pabrit Rawani, and Arjun Rawani and Bali Rawani have been convicted for the charge u/s 323 of the and have been sentenced to R.I. for 01 year. The sentences passed against Pabrit Rawani and Rawan Rawani were directed to run concurrently.

3. The prosecution case arises out of the fardbeyan of Barka Rawani recorded on 22.07.1993, in which, it has been stated that at 8:00 A.M. the informant along with Barhu Rawani and his sons Ghanshyam Rawani and Bhim Rawani were ploughing the field. At the same place Khiro Rawani, Amin Rawani, Chito Rawani, Baleshwar Rawani, Sukar Rawani and others were uprooting the paddy seedlings. It has been alleged that a mob comprising of 22-23 persons variously armed had come and had prevented the informant and others in ploughing the field. This led to exchange of expletives and on the orders of Mathura Rawani and Maljit Rawani the accused persons committed assault upon the informant. The accused Pabrit Rawani and Sukhdeo Rawani assaulted Khiro Rawani as a result of which he fell down and thereafter Rawan Rawani climbed on his chest and pressed it and Khiro Rawani died at the spot. It has also been alleged that Chito Rawani was assaulted by Pabrit Rawani, Arjun Rawani and Bali Rawani. The incident occurred on account of the land dispute between both the sides.

Based on the aforesaid allegations Karon P.S. Case No. 43 of 1993 was instituted u/s 147, 148, 149, 447, 324, 307 and 302 of the IPC . On completion of investigation charge sheet was submitted and after cognizance was taken the case was committed to the Court of Sessions where it was registered as Sessions Case No. 69 of 1994. Charge was framed against the accused Pabrit Rawani, Sukhdeo Rawani and Rawan Rawani u/s 302 of the , against Mathura Rawani u/s 302/114 of the , against Pabrit Rawani, Gogal Rawani, Rawan Rawani and Bishwanath Rawani u/s 307 of the , against Pabrit Rawani, Arjun Rawani and Balli Rawani u/s 323 of the and against all the accused persons u/s 302/149 of the which was read over and explained to them in Hindi to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

4. Since the appellant no. 1 (Arjun Rawani) and appellant no. 4 (Mathura Rawani) are no more their appeals stand abated and survives only against the rest of the appellants.

5. The prosecution has examined as many as nine witnesses in support of its case.

6. P.W.1 (Amin Rawani) has stated that at 8:00 A.M. he was in his field uprooting the paddy seedlings and along with him were Kaleshwar, Khiro, Bhim, Chito and Sukar Rawani. Ghanshyam and Barhu were ploughing. Barka Rawani was also present. He has stated that Mathura Rawani had come with 23-24 persons and started abusing them and asked them not to plough the field. There was exchange of hot words between them. Mathura and Maljit had ordered the others to kill at which Pabrit, Rawan and Sukhdeo assaulted Khiro and felled him on the ground. Rawan Rawani climbed on the chest of Khiro and pressed it. Khiro died at the spot itself. Barka Rawani was assaulted by Rawan, Bishwanath, Pabrit, Kisun and Sukhdeo which resulted in Barka Rawani becoming unconscious. Chito was assaulted by Ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top