Back
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT, RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Rajkumar Paul, S/o Sri Ashok Paul – Appellant
Versus
Mamta Kumari, W/o. Rajkumar Paul, D/o. Sri Umesh Paul – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.
1. Heard Mr. Shashank Shekhar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sameer Saurabh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27-09-2024 passed in Original Suit No. 146/2023 by Sri Rajesh Kumar No. 1, learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamtara whereby and whereunder, the suit preferred by the appellant under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, has been dismissed.
3. For the sake of convenience, both the parties are referred to in this judgment as per their status before the learned trial court.
4. The petitioner/husband (appellant herein) had preferred a suit under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent (respondent herein also) in which it has been stated that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the respondent on 13-12-2016 at village Piprasole, District- Jamtara as per Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage, the petitioner and the respondent started residing together at Village- Birajpur, District-Dumka and Village-Palojori, District- Deoghar and out of the said wedlock, a son was
Cruelty and desertion in marital law require substantial proof; a spouse's commuting for work and financial support does not constitute grounds for dissolution of marriage.
To establish cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act, allegations must demonstrate serious misconduct affecting marital relations, not simply dissatisfaction. The burden of proof lies entirely on the pe....
Cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act requires substantial evidence demonstrating severe marital discord, unproven allegations do not justify divorce.
Solemnization of second marriage by wife during subsistence of first constitutes mental cruelty, justifying divorce; additional evidence thereof admissible in appeal.
Mental cruelty can be inferred from a spouse's persistent refusal to cohabit and disrespectful behavior, justifying divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
The Family Court erred by dissolving the marriage based on irretrievable breakdown, not recognized under the Hindu Marriage Act, and failed to apply statutory criteria for divorce, specifically cruel....
The court emphasized that the right of a woman to have reproductive choice is an inseparable part of her personal liberty as envisaged under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
