JHARKHAND HIGH COURT, RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, DEEPAK ROSHAN
Ajay Kumar Barnwal, S/o. Sri Kedar Prasad Barnwal – Appellant
Versus
Suv Laxmi Varati @ Doly Kumari, W/o. Ajay Kumar Barnwal, D/o. Sri Satya Narayan Barnwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.
1. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Anshuman Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 29-08-2018 (decree signed on 31-08-2018) passed by Sri Yogeshwar Mani, learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in Original Suit No. 323/2015, whereby and whereunder, the suit preferred by the appellant for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent under Section 13(1)(i)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been dismissed.
3. For the sake of convenience, both parties are referred to in this judgment as per their status before the learned trial court.
4. The petitioner/husband (appellant herein) had filed a suit for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent/wife (respondent herein also) in which it has been stated that the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized as per Hindu rites and customs at Swayamwar Vatika, Deoghar on 02-06-2013. After the marriage was solemnized, the respondent came to her matrimonial house at Chas, Bokaro where she stayed for 6 days. The respondent is a temperamental and whimsical lady and had
Solemnization of second marriage by wife during subsistence of first constitutes mental cruelty, justifying divorce; additional evidence thereof admissible in appeal.
To establish cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act, allegations must demonstrate serious misconduct affecting marital relations, not simply dissatisfaction. The burden of proof lies entirely on the pe....
Cruelty and desertion in marital law require substantial proof; a spouse's commuting for work and financial support does not constitute grounds for dissolution of marriage.
Point of Law : Matrimonial Dispute - Cruelty - None of instances of cruelty, pleaded in plaint, would amount to commission of cruelty within meaning of Section 13 of Act, 1955 nor does it satisfy the....
Cruelty, as a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, requires substantial proof of conduct that severely impacts the mental or physical well-being of the other spouse, making cohabitation i....
Cruelty in matrimonial law encompasses both physical and mental aspects, with the latter requiring a cumulative assessment of conduct that causes reasonable apprehension of harm to the aggrieved spou....
Cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act requires substantial evidence demonstrating severe marital discord, unproven allegations do not justify divorce.
A spouse must substantiate claims of cruelty to dissolve marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, emphasizing the need for evidence beyond ordinary marital disputes.
The court affirmed that the evidence of persistent cruelty justified the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, establishing a clear breakdown of the marital relat....
Husband's unproven allegations of wife's religious insistence, cohabitation refusal, and separate living demand do not constitute cruelty; his rebuff of her reconciliation efforts bars divorce as own....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.