Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Anuj Kumar Sinha, S/o Sri Rabindra Prasad Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Moushmi Srivastava, W/o Anuj Kumar Sinha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.
1. Heard Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Ankit Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 03-08-2022 (decree signed on 10-08-2022) passed by Sri Gati Krishna Tewary, learned Additional Principal Judge, Additional Family Court-II, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur in Original Suit No. 628 of 2017, whereby and wherever the suit preferred by the appellant under Section 13(1)(ia)(ib) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 has been dismissed.
3. For the sake of convenience, both the parties are referred to in this judgment as per their status before the learned trial court.
4. The petitioner/husband (Appellant herein) had preferred a suit for dissolution of his marriage with the respondent (respondent herein) under Section 13(1)(ia)&(ib) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 in which, inter alia, it has been stated that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with the respondent on 23-01-2011 at Adityapur, Holding No. 221/2/1, Road No. 14, Adityapur, P.S. R.I.T, District-Saraikela, Kharsawan and the reception was held on 25-01-2011 at Sunshine Enclave, Dimna Road, Mango
Cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act requires substantial evidence demonstrating severe marital discord, unproven allegations do not justify divorce.
To establish cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act, allegations must demonstrate serious misconduct affecting marital relations, not simply dissatisfaction. The burden of proof lies entirely on the pe....
Cruelty and desertion in marital law require substantial proof; a spouse's commuting for work and financial support does not constitute grounds for dissolution of marriage.
Cruelty, as defined under the Hindu Marriage Act, allows for divorce when prolonged separation and mutual hostility inflict emotional pain, rendering cohabitation intolerable.
Solemnization of second marriage by wife during subsistence of first constitutes mental cruelty, justifying divorce; additional evidence thereof admissible in appeal.
Prolonged separation and lack of cooperation can indicate irretrievable breakdown of marriage, leading to divorce under Hindu Marriage Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that evidence of cruelty and desertion must be adequately proven, and reliance on retracted allegations without considering the reasons for retract....
The court affirmed that the evidence of persistent cruelty justified the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, establishing a clear breakdown of the marital relat....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
