Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Nand Deo Ram, Son Of Late Ram Das Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks payment of retiral dues. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. case aligned with previous judgment but under challenge. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. nature of deputation determines entitlement to benefits. (Para 6) |
| 4. state must regularize and address monetary claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By way of present writ application the petitioner has prayed for direction upon the respondents to ensure and make payment of all retiral dues which has not been paid to the petitioner after his superannuation from service on 31.01.2018 as Peon under Minor Irrigation Division, Medininagar under the heads of (A) Gratuity, (B) Fixation of Pension, (C) Packing Allowance, (D) Utilized leave for 300 days, (E) Salary for the period from 1995 to 2000 along with the interest accumulated thereof.
3. After perusing the respective affidavits, it appears that the liability of BHALCO has already been paid to the petitioner, however, the liability of State of Jharkhand has not been satisfied till date.
4. Learned counsel for the respective parties including the State of Jharkhand fairly submits that this case is squarely covered by the decision ren
The court reaffirmed that employees on extended deputation due to closure of parent organizations may be entitled to retirement benefits and regularization, under principles of equal treatment in emp....
The petitioner was entitled to the 6th pay revision as applicable to regular employees, as per the judgment in Bihar State Beverages Corporation Limited and Others vs. Naresh Kumar Mishra and Others.
The court clarified that a review application must showcase error apparent on record or new material; significant delay in filing undermines its maintainability.
The university has exclusive authority over faculty absorption and regularization based on commission recommendations, and previous government notifications remain valid.
Past service counts towards pension eligibility for full-time employees despite previous contractual status, aligning with government policy.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the effective date of permanent absorption is determined by the Cabinet approval, and the petitioner's claim for seniority from an earlier dat....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
