SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Jhk) 178

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M.S. Sonak, C.J., Rajesh Shankar, J.
Damodar Valley Corporation through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director – Appellant
Versus
Sukar Koeri - Respondent
L.P.A. No.249 of 2025
Decided On : 20-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mrs. Khalida Haya Rashmi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate, Mr. Shivam Utkarsh Sahay, Advocate

Non-examination of the complainant during disciplinary proceedings vitiates the process, infringing natural justice principles, thus justifying overturning of the removal order.

Headnote:(A) Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Judicial Review - The principal issue was the legality of the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner challenging the removal from service based on allegations of impersonation. Court held that non-examination of the complainant in the inquiry vitiated the proceedings, infringing principles of natural justice. (Paras 17, 22, 24)

(B) Employment Law - Quasi-judicial proceedings require adherence to principles of natural justice, including the right to cross-examine witnesses. (Paras 21, 23)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, initially appointed as a casual worker, faced removal following allegations he impersonated his deceased brother for employment. The disciplinary proceedings culminated in his removal after complaints were filed but lacked the complainant's presence in the inquiry.

Findings of Court:
The learned Single Judge quashed the removal order, awarding the petitioner 25% of back wages and consequential benefits without reinstatement due to superannuation.

Issues: Whether the disciplinary authority's decision was upheld amidst claims of natural justice violations and the necessity of witness examination.

Ratio Decidendi: The court affirmed the need for compliance with natural justice in quasi-judicial proceedings, emphasizing the complainant's examination as crucial.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments and legal contentions raised (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14)
3. court’s observations on the procedural conduct (Para 17 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 24)
4. ratio decidendi related to principles of natural justice (Para 18 , 21 , 23 , 26)
5. final conclusion and order of dismissal (Para 25 , 27 , 28)

JUDGMENT :

Rajesh Shankar, J.

1. The present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the Order/Judgment dated 01.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(S) No.3576 of 2019 allowing the writ petition filed by the petitioner/respondent (hereinafter to be referred as the petitioner) and quashing the order dated 07.12.2018 passed by the Additional Secretary-cum-disciplinary authority, Damodar Valley Corporation vide No.F/AS/PS/ Conf./F-03/30 whereby the petitioner was imposed punishment of removal from the services of the corporation with immediate effect as well as the order dated 18.06.2019 bearing No. HR/Disc. & Comp/Complaints & DP ‘C’ & ‘D’/48/913 passed by the Executive Director (HR)-cum-Appellate Authority, Damodar Valley Corporation whereby the punishment of removal of the petitioner from service imposed by the Disciplinary Authority, was affirmed.

2. The factual background of the case as stated in the writ petition is as follows: -

(i) The petitioner was initially appointed as casual worker in Soil Conservation Department of Damodar Valley Corporation at Hazaribagh on 01.10.1974 and worked there on daily wages from 01.10.1974 to 08.01.1994.

(ii) The petitioner along with others filed writ petition being C.W.J.C No. 1907 of 1992(R) on 03.07.1992 seeking their regularisation and pursuant to the order dated 22.07.1993 passed in the said writ petition, the petitioner was regularized on 10.01.1994. Moreover, in all the documents including PAN Card, Voter List, Adhaar Card, etc., his name was recorded as Sukar Koeri S/o Late Nanhu Koeri.

(iii) At the fag end of service of the petitioner, a complaint was filed by one Gangadhar Mahto, so called son of Late Sukar Koeri (hereinafter referred as the complainant) and on the basis of the said complaint, the petitioner was served a memo of charge dated 11.05.2017 alleging that his actual name was Budhan Mahto and he had secured employment in DVC by impersonating himself as his elder brother namely Sukar Koeri who was working in Soil Conservation Department of DVC as casual worker, however, he had already died on 04.07.1979.

(iv) Thereafter, the Director, Rehabilitation & Land Acquisition Department (DRLA), DVC, Hazaribag was appointed as enquiry officer who submitted the enquiry report stating that the writ petitioner had impersonated himself as Sukar Koeri whereas his actual name was Budhan Mahto and had continued in the service of DVC on the assumed name. Hence, he derived monitory benefit as wages/salary along with other consequential benefits by way of impersonation, forgery and cheating.

(v) A copy of the enquiry report was communicated to the writ petitioner which was received by him on 15.11.2018 in response to which he submitted representation dated 19.11.2018 objecting the findings of the enquiry report.

(vi) Thereafter, the disciplinary authority vide order dated 07.12.2018 imposed punishment of removal from service upon the petitioner with immediate effect observing that all charges levelled against him were proved beyond reasonable doubt which were grave in nature involving impersonation, falsification, forgery and mis-appropriation of government/corporation’s fund.

(vii) The petitioner preferred appeal before the appellate authority on 08.01.2019, however, the same was also dismissed vide order dated 18.06.2019 affirming the order passed by the disciplinary authority.

3. Subsequently, the petitioner filed writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 3576 of 2019 challenging the order dated 07.12.2018 passed by the disciplinary authority as well as the order dated 18.06.2019 passed by the appella

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top